Search found 21 matches
- 16 Oct 2024, 10:25
- Forum: Test Preparation
- Topic: Does ETS-Board is necessary for PN pretesting?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 308
Re: Does ETS-Board is necessary for PN pretesting?
Hello Team, I want to test my Profinet device before sending it to the certification lab and for that I found the PN test bundle on PI website. The PN specification doc says that, to do the PN pretest we need to use the ETS-Board. Does it necessary to use the ETS-Board or we can use any Profinet IO...
- 12 Sep 2024, 18:51
- Forum: Getting Started - Automated RT Tester
- Topic: Help Needed with Pre-Testing Two-Port PROFINET Device Configuration
- Replies: 3
- Views: 484
Re: Help Needed with Pre-Testing Two-Port PROFINET Device Configuration
Hi everyone, I am currently pre-testing a two-port PROFINET device before applying for the actual certification in the lab. I am using an ETS board for testing and following the steps outlined in the product documentation. Here is what I have done so far: Set the IP for the NIC connected to the ETS...
- 23 Jul 2024, 10:42
- Forum: PROFINET Implementation
- Topic: Switch as Profinet I/O device - LLDP support
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2842
Re: Switch as Profinet I/O device - LLDP support
We are starting development to support Profinet on our switches. We are aiming for Compliance Class B certification. I am trying to look for what are the LLDP TLVs that are to be supported by the switch acting as a Profinet I/O device. Is there a specification I can refer to similar to the 802.1ab(...
- 28 May 2024, 10:33
- Forum: Process - Certification "How to"
- Topic: Profinet certification
- Replies: 15
- Views: 1209
- 17 Apr 2024, 16:45
- Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
- Topic: IM5_Supported_ETS_ART_2.44.1_Problem
- Replies: 2
- Views: 242
Re: IM5_Supported_ETS_ART_2.44.1_Problem
Hello PROFINET Forum experts. I have a couple of problems. For the other I will start another post. This is strange. With ART 2.44.1 we are testing our solution which now supports I&M5 (the previous version didn't so this is the first time I see this.). The ART is telling me that the GSDML file...
- 09 Apr 2024, 16:44
- Forum: PROFINET Implementation
- Topic: Specification for BlockQualifier FactoryReset
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5379
Re: Specification for BlockQualifier FactoryReset
The PN protocol specification (2.4MU4) defines the BlockQualifier field for almost all DCP Suboptions (4.3.1.4.11). But I am missing a definition for the Suboption FactoryReset. Shall the value be ignored by the PN device? In contrast, the BlockQualifier for ResetToFactory is used to select the res...
- 04 Apr 2024, 12:03
- Forum: Test Preparation
- Topic: ETS board, flashing system image via ethernet
- Replies: 1
- Views: 198
- 19 Mar 2024, 12:51
- Forum: Test Preparation
- Topic: ETS for IRT and Netload
- Replies: 1
- Views: 154
Re: ETS for IRT and Netload
My understanding is that - for IRT testing I need a different setup using the SPIRTA tool and a separate PCIE-Card - for Netload testing I need different setup using the pinetload tool on a Linux machine Would this be correct so far? Yes, that is correct. I do not know roadmap for those topics. I a...
- 06 Mar 2024, 07:50
- Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
- Topic: Non-Profinet-neighbor Testcases with ETS-Board
- Replies: 2
- Views: 216
Re: Non-Profinet-neighbor Testcases with ETS-Board
Hello everyone, I have a question about the non-profinet-neighbor test cases with the ETS board (ART tester version 2.44.1.2) If I have understood the test specification correctly, the non-profinet neighbors are simulated. So no additional hardware is required. With the current ART-Tester version, ...
- 16 Jan 2024, 11:08
- Forum: GSDX
- Topic: Signing of GSDX file
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2760
- 10 Jan 2024, 10:30
- Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
- Topic: Unexpected LLDP frame from "PROFIBUS" TLV?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 497
Re: Unexpected LLDP frame from "PROFIBUS" TLV?
Hello Profinet experts, currently I'm working with a certification tool from ODVA (CT20) to test our Ethernet/IP device. Unforunately it raises an error "Received LLDP frame from unexpected Source MAC Address: 00:0a:cd:2c:ed:aa". I examined this LLDP frame with Wireshark and see some inte...
- 09 Jan 2024, 14:38
- Forum: PROFINET Implementation
- Topic: Profinet as a software solution
- Replies: 7
- Views: 24966
Re: Re:
Is the pi profinet-community-stack a suitable start point for creating a client software implementation on Windows PC? I advise you not to go that way unless you are very experienced with Profinet. The Community Stack is only a pure Protocol stack without dedicated APIs for the application and only...
- 10 Oct 2023, 13:16
- Forum: PROFINET Implementation
- Topic: Testing in early development phase
- Replies: 5
- Views: 18749
Is there a PC-based Profinet master simulator available, or is it preferable to use an HW CPU for this purpose ? There are PC based implementations available but i personally do not have experience with it. I am aware of https://profinetcommander.com/ and https://www.codesys.com/ but there may be ...
- 10 Oct 2023, 07:59
- Forum: Process - Certification "How to"
- Topic: Profinet certification
- Replies: 15
- Views: 1209
Re: Profinet certification
The same tools used by the testlab are available for free to all PI members. You can find the bundle containing the tool here: https://www.profibus.com/download/profinet-test-bundle
- 10 Oct 2023, 07:58
- Forum: Test Preparation
- Topic: Required hardware for the certification tests
- Replies: 1
- Views: 142
What hardware is required for the certification tests (test bundle) to independently test the device before sending it to the certification lab ? This is stated in the test specification. You can find it here https://www.profibus.com/download/profinet-test-specification or as part of the test bund...
- 09 Oct 2023, 13:19
- Forum: PROFINET Implementation
- Topic: Memory footprint
- Replies: 1
- Views: 11666
- 09 Oct 2023, 09:24
- Forum: Process - Certification "How to"
- Topic: Profinet certification
- Replies: 15
- Views: 1209
- 09 Oct 2023, 09:18
- Forum: PROFINET Implementation
- Topic: Testing in early development phase
- Replies: 5
- Views: 18749
During the early development phase, what is the most effective approach to test the interoperation between the Master and Slave (device) ? I propose to use a real-world engineering system and matching PLC, e.g. Siemens TIA Portal and a matching Siemens Profinet PLC. Depending on the effort and amo...
- 09 Oct 2023, 09:11
- Forum: PROFINET Implementation
- Topic: Profinet as a software solution
- Replies: 7
- Views: 24966
Is the pi profinet-community-stack a suitable start point for creating a client software implementation on Windows PC? I advise you not to go that way unless you are very experienced with Profinet. The Community Stack is only a pure Protocol stack without dedicated APIs for the application and only...
- 06 Oct 2023, 09:34
- Forum: PROFINET Implementation
- Topic: Profinet as a software solution
- Replies: 7
- Views: 24966
Is it possible to add Profinet to my device using a software solution ? Yes, it is possible. There are some vendors available offering such software-only solutions. Depending on hardware capabilities, you may have some limitations such as not reaching the highest specified netload class not reachi...
- 06 Oct 2023, 09:29
- Forum: Process - Certification "How to"
- Topic: Profinet standard releases
- Replies: 1
- Views: 185
Typically, there is a yearly maintenance update of the basic Profinet specifications.Sarah_Zhang wrote: ↑04 Oct 2023, 10:44 What is the frequency or release schedule for new Profinet standard versions ?