Search found 24 matches
- 26 Feb 2025, 15:29
- Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
- Topic: IM5_Supported_ETS_ART_2.44.1_Problem
- Replies: 5
- Views: 28635
Re: IM5_Supported_ETS_ART_2.44.1_Problem
Hello, I'm having this exactly same problem when testing my device, but with the latest ART, version 2.45.0.2. Could it be a regression in test bundle? Does anybody experienced similar issue? Thanks. Yes, i see the same issue (message "According to the GSDML the 'IM5_Supported' is not set to '...
- 10 Feb 2025, 09:11
- Forum: Getting Started - Automated RT Tester
- Topic: Setup required to pre-test a two-port PROFINET device with redundancy S2
- Replies: 5
- Views: 79365
Re: Setup required to pre-test a two-port PROFINET device with redundancy S2
Hi, Of course, that was missing in my GSDML file! Fixed and now all S2 tests are running successfully. Thank you very much. Now my next question refers to MRC Interop - Client test. I guess the setup I would have to put together is the one shown in section 5.2.6.6, figure 5-21. If so, what do I do ...
- 08 Jan 2025, 08:18
- Forum: Miscellaneous
- Topic: GSDML Spec, SNMP_FeaturesSupported, "is removed???"
- Replies: 7
- Views: 35028
Re: GSDML Spec, SNMP_FeaturesSupported, "is removed???"
in clause "8.27.5 CIM_Supported features", that: +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- _____"NOTICE: The attribute DCP_FeaturesSupported (o, TokenList, v2.43) is _____removed with v2.44. It is expected that no one has used this attri...
- 16 Oct 2024, 10:25
- Forum: Test Preparation
- Topic: Does ETS-Board is necessary for PN pretesting?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 12617
Re: Does ETS-Board is necessary for PN pretesting?
Hello Team, I want to test my Profinet device before sending it to the certification lab and for that I found the PN test bundle on PI website. The PN specification doc says that, to do the PN pretest we need to use the ETS-Board. Does it necessary to use the ETS-Board or we can use any Profinet IO...
- 12 Sep 2024, 18:51
- Forum: Getting Started - Automated RT Tester
- Topic: Help Needed with Pre-Testing Two-Port PROFINET Device Configuration
- Replies: 3
- Views: 14494
Re: Help Needed with Pre-Testing Two-Port PROFINET Device Configuration
Hi everyone, I am currently pre-testing a two-port PROFINET device before applying for the actual certification in the lab. I am using an ETS board for testing and following the steps outlined in the product documentation. Here is what I have done so far: Set the IP for the NIC connected to the ETS...
- 23 Jul 2024, 10:42
- Forum: PROFINET Implementation
- Topic: Switch as Profinet I/O device - LLDP support
- Replies: 1
- Views: 10035
Re: Switch as Profinet I/O device - LLDP support
We are starting development to support Profinet on our switches. We are aiming for Compliance Class B certification. I am trying to look for what are the LLDP TLVs that are to be supported by the switch acting as a Profinet I/O device. Is there a specification I can refer to similar to the 802.1ab(...
- 28 May 2024, 10:33
- Forum: Process - Certification "How to"
- Topic: Profinet certification
- Replies: 18
- Views: 126366
- 17 Apr 2024, 16:45
- Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
- Topic: IM5_Supported_ETS_ART_2.44.1_Problem
- Replies: 5
- Views: 28635
Re: IM5_Supported_ETS_ART_2.44.1_Problem
Hello PROFINET Forum experts. I have a couple of problems. For the other I will start another post. This is strange. With ART 2.44.1 we are testing our solution which now supports I&M5 (the previous version didn't so this is the first time I see this.). The ART is telling me that the GSDML file...
- 09 Apr 2024, 16:44
- Forum: PROFINET Implementation
- Topic: Specification for BlockQualifier FactoryReset
- Replies: 2
- Views: 15278
Re: Specification for BlockQualifier FactoryReset
The PN protocol specification (2.4MU4) defines the BlockQualifier field for almost all DCP Suboptions (4.3.1.4.11). But I am missing a definition for the Suboption FactoryReset. Shall the value be ignored by the PN device? In contrast, the BlockQualifier for ResetToFactory is used to select the res...
- 04 Apr 2024, 12:03
- Forum: Test Preparation
- Topic: ETS board, flashing system image via ethernet
- Replies: 1
- Views: 9383
- 19 Mar 2024, 12:51
- Forum: Test Preparation
- Topic: ETS for IRT and Netload
- Replies: 1
- Views: 9155
Re: ETS for IRT and Netload
My understanding is that - for IRT testing I need a different setup using the SPIRTA tool and a separate PCIE-Card - for Netload testing I need different setup using the pinetload tool on a Linux machine Would this be correct so far? Yes, that is correct. I do not know roadmap for those topics. I a...
- 06 Mar 2024, 07:50
- Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
- Topic: Non-Profinet-neighbor Testcases with ETS-Board
- Replies: 2
- Views: 9023
Re: Non-Profinet-neighbor Testcases with ETS-Board
Hello everyone, I have a question about the non-profinet-neighbor test cases with the ETS board (ART tester version 2.44.1.2) If I have understood the test specification correctly, the non-profinet neighbors are simulated. So no additional hardware is required. With the current ART-Tester version, ...
- 16 Jan 2024, 11:08
- Forum: GSDX
- Topic: Signing of GSDX file
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5709
- 10 Jan 2024, 10:30
- Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
- Topic: Unexpected LLDP frame from "PROFIBUS" TLV?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 16378
Re: Unexpected LLDP frame from "PROFIBUS" TLV?
Hello Profinet experts, currently I'm working with a certification tool from ODVA (CT20) to test our Ethernet/IP device. Unforunately it raises an error "Received LLDP frame from unexpected Source MAC Address: 00:0a:cd:2c:ed:aa". I examined this LLDP frame with Wireshark and see some inte...
- 09 Jan 2024, 14:38
- Forum: PROFINET Implementation
- Topic: Profinet as a software solution
- Replies: 7
- Views: 42063
Re: Re:
Is the pi profinet-community-stack a suitable start point for creating a client software implementation on Windows PC? I advise you not to go that way unless you are very experienced with Profinet. The Community Stack is only a pure Protocol stack without dedicated APIs for the application and only...
- 10 Oct 2023, 13:16
- Forum: PROFINET Implementation
- Topic: Testing in early development phase
- Replies: 5
- Views: 32934
Is there a PC-based Profinet master simulator available, or is it preferable to use an HW CPU for this purpose ? There are PC based implementations available but i personally do not have experience with it. I am aware of https://profinetcommander.com/ and https://www.codesys.com/ but there may be ...
- 10 Oct 2023, 07:59
- Forum: Process - Certification "How to"
- Topic: Profinet certification
- Replies: 18
- Views: 126366
Re: Profinet certification
The same tools used by the testlab are available for free to all PI members. You can find the bundle containing the tool here: https://www.profibus.com/download/profinet-test-bundle
- 10 Oct 2023, 07:58
- Forum: Test Preparation
- Topic: Required hardware for the certification tests
- Replies: 1
- Views: 7704
What hardware is required for the certification tests (test bundle) to independently test the device before sending it to the certification lab ? This is stated in the test specification. You can find it here https://www.profibus.com/download/profinet-test-specification or as part of the test bund...
- 09 Oct 2023, 13:19
- Forum: PROFINET Implementation
- Topic: Memory footprint
- Replies: 1
- Views: 21840
- 09 Oct 2023, 09:24
- Forum: Process - Certification "How to"
- Topic: Profinet certification
- Replies: 18
- Views: 126366
- 09 Oct 2023, 09:18
- Forum: PROFINET Implementation
- Topic: Testing in early development phase
- Replies: 5
- Views: 32934
During the early development phase, what is the most effective approach to test the interoperation between the Master and Slave (device) ? I propose to use a real-world engineering system and matching PLC, e.g. Siemens TIA Portal and a matching Siemens Profinet PLC. Depending on the effort and amo...
- 09 Oct 2023, 09:11
- Forum: PROFINET Implementation
- Topic: Profinet as a software solution
- Replies: 7
- Views: 42063
Is the pi profinet-community-stack a suitable start point for creating a client software implementation on Windows PC? I advise you not to go that way unless you are very experienced with Profinet. The Community Stack is only a pure Protocol stack without dedicated APIs for the application and only...
- 06 Oct 2023, 09:34
- Forum: PROFINET Implementation
- Topic: Profinet as a software solution
- Replies: 7
- Views: 42063
Is it possible to add Profinet to my device using a software solution ? Yes, it is possible. There are some vendors available offering such software-only solutions. Depending on hardware capabilities, you may have some limitations such as not reaching the highest specified netload class not reachi...
- 06 Oct 2023, 09:29
- Forum: Process - Certification "How to"
- Topic: Profinet standard releases
- Replies: 1
- Views: 8437
Typically, there is a yearly maintenance update of the basic Profinet specifications.Sarah_Zhang wrote: ↑04 Oct 2023, 10:44 What is the frequency or release schedule for new Profinet standard versions ?