Search found 31 matches
- 22 Sep 2025, 14:21
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: PROFISAFE Time disconnection
- Replies: 6
- Views: 41422
Re: PROFISAFE Time disconnection
[...] Hello, thank you very much for your answer. I 'm sorry, but I don't know what is the SFRT :( I mean, I just know that if the connection is good between the remote control and the PLC, and that en emergency stop is pushed, i need to stop immediatly. But, also, I don't have to stop the machine ...
- 22 Sep 2025, 14:17
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: PROFISAFE Time disconnection
- Replies: 6
- Views: 41422
Re: PROFISAFE Time disconnection
[...] Hello Christian, Thank you for your answer ,but I didn't see it, sorry. I understand in your message that it could be possile for your understanding. I am just setting up a moke up to test it, but it seems that I am limited to 1,92s with the PROFINET layer. I mean, in the Real Time settings o...
- 12 Sep 2025, 17:18
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: PROFISAFE Time disconnection
- Replies: 6
- Views: 41422
Re: PROFISAFE Time disconnection
Hello PROFINET experts :) , I am working on an architecture on which i need to send an Emergency Stop Signal throught a Black Chanel communication system (trought antenna). On the machine side, I have a SIEMENS PLC (S71500 family), which activate the power of the machine. On the other side, I have ...
- 12 Sep 2025, 12:10
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: PROFISAFE Time disconnection
- Replies: 6
- Views: 41422
Re: PROFISAFE Time disconnection
Hello PROFINET experts :) , I am working on an architecture on which i need to send an Emergency Stop Signal throught a Black Chanel communication system (trought antenna). On the machine side, I have a SIEMENS PLC (S71500 family), which activate the power of the machine. On the other side, I have ...
- 26 Mar 2025, 15:18
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: PROFIsafe master/controller stack provider list
- Replies: 2
- Views: 126846
Re: PROFIsafe master/controller stack provider list
Can someone provide a comprehensive list of all of the vendors providing PROFIsafe master/controller software stacks? Please :) . Unfortunately, such a "comprehensive" list does not exist and would be rather small, and you will need to invest your own time to investigate whether the provi...
- 16 Dec 2024, 11:50
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: PROFIsafe Parameterization in Run (PiR) Feature
- Replies: 2
- Views: 36685
Re: PROFIsafe Parameterization in Run (PiR) Feature
Could you please provide guidance on if the following feature --- PROFIsafe Parameterization in Run (PiR) --- is a mandatory feature for a device certification according to the PROFIsafe V2.6 MU1 / PROFIsafe V2.6 MU2? No, PiR is not a mandatory, but an optional feature. All new features described i...
- 21 Nov 2024, 15:32
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: Why Should the Watchdog Time (F_WD_Time) Not Be More Than 130% the Minimum Time?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 33784
Re: Why Should the Watchdog Time (F_WD_Time) Not Be More Than 130% the Minimum Time?
The PROFIsafe Profile states in section 'Adjustment of watchdog times for FSCP 3/1': It is highly recommended that the difference between the assigned parameter value F_WD_Time and the sum (DAT, HAT, and bus transmission delays) does not exceed 30 %. Why is this the case? In section 'Calculation an...
- 21 Nov 2024, 15:29
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: Why Should the Watchdog Time (F_WD_Time) Not Be More Than 130% the Minimum Time?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 33784
Why Should the Watchdog Time (F_WD_Time) Not Be More Than 130% the Minimum Time?
The PROFIsafe Profile states in section 'Adjustment of watchdog times for FSCP 3/1':
Why is this the case?It is highly recommended that the difference between the assigned parameter value F_WD_Time and the sum (DAT, HAT, and bus transmission delays) does not exceed 30 %.
- 06 Mar 2024, 08:42
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: FSCP Test Mode
- Replies: 1
- Views: 36830
FSCP Test Mode
The "FSCP Test Mode" is mentioned several times in the PROFIsafe specification, but it is not defined explicitly.
- 30 Nov 2023, 17:48
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: Licence Conditions for PROFIsafe Layer Tester
- Replies: 1
- Views: 38984
Re: Licence Conditions for PROFIsafe Layer Tester
(from PSDW 2023) Is there any license condition on the PROFIsafe Layer Tester? E.g. can it be distributed freely internally in a company ,once it has been purchased by this company or is this restricted to this department/division, which order the Layer Tester? The layer tester may be used freely w...
- 30 Nov 2023, 17:47
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: Licence Conditions for PROFIsafe Layer Tester
- Replies: 1
- Views: 38984
Licence Conditions for PROFIsafe Layer Tester
(from PSDW 2023)
Is there any license condition on the PROFIsafe Layer Tester? E.g. can it be distributed freely internally in a company ,once it has been purchased by this company or is this restricted to this department/division, which order the Layer Tester?
Is there any license condition on the PROFIsafe Layer Tester? E.g. can it be distributed freely internally in a company ,once it has been purchased by this company or is this restricted to this department/division, which order the Layer Tester?
- 30 Nov 2023, 17:45
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: Future of the PCI-based CP1616 Hardware for PROFIsafe Layer Tester
- Replies: 1
- Views: 38316
From PSDW 2023: Are there plans on changing the CP1616 card to some other HW? Today it's very difficult to find a PC with a PCI slot only. PROFIdrive tester tool are changing the test HW to a standard S7-1500 CPU. You say that old PC’s with PCI slots can still be used. Yes, as long our company IT p...
- 30 Nov 2023, 17:41
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: Future of the PCI-based CP1616 Hardware for PROFIsafe Layer Tester
- Replies: 1
- Views: 38316
Future of the PCI-based CP1616 Hardware for PROFIsafe Layer Tester
From PSDW 2023: Are there plans on changing the CP1616 card to some other HW? Today it's very difficult to find a PC with a PCI slot only. PROFIdrive tester tool are changing the test HW to a standard S7-1500 CPU. You say that old PC’s with PCI slots can still be used. Yes, as long our company IT po...
- 13 Nov 2023, 18:07
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: Safe Router?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 42120
- 13 Nov 2023, 18:05
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: Safe Router?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 42120
Safe Router?
Question from the PROFIsafe Designer Workshop in October 2023: Does there exist a "safe router" which can bundle and redistribute safety data? This could be used to, e.g., distribute safety data from one safety function (consisting of senor/logic/actuator) to additionally affected actuator...
- 13 Nov 2023, 17:55
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: Safety-Related LED Indicators?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 39851
- 13 Nov 2023, 17:54
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: Safety-Related LED Indicators?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 39851
Safety-Related LED Indicators?
Question from the PROFIsafe Designer Workshop in October 2023: The PROFIsafe specification mentions the possibility to use an LED on a device to indicate different states. Must this LED be "implemented" in a safety-related way (i.e., to guarantee that it is actually switched on or blinking...
- 13 Nov 2023, 17:45
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: "Communication PFH": What is it, and how is it calculated?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 40612
- 13 Nov 2023, 17:43
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: "Communication PFH": What is it, and how is it calculated?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 40612
"Communication PFH": What is it, and how is it calculated?
Question from the PROFIsafe Designer Workshop in October 2023:
We briefly heard about a "communication PFH" or "allocating the communication PFH values / residual error rates". What is this about? Do we have to calculate this "communication PFH"?
We briefly heard about a "communication PFH" or "allocating the communication PFH values / residual error rates". What is this about? Do we have to calculate this "communication PFH"?
- 13 Nov 2023, 14:11
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: Parameterization in Run (PiR): Benefits and Logic of Safe State
- Replies: 1
- Views: 42292
- 13 Nov 2023, 14:10
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: Parameterization in Run (PiR): Benefits and Logic of Safe State
- Replies: 1
- Views: 42292
Parameterization in Run (PiR): Benefits and Logic of Safe State
Question from the PROFIsafe Designer Workshop in October 2023: Did I understand it correctly that you cannot "circumvent" the "safe state" [editor's note: i.e., externally ensuring the safety of the part of the machinery/plant that is affected by the F-Device on which PiR is perf...
- 10 Nov 2023, 16:33
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: PROFIsafe and Security
- Replies: 1
- Views: 41864
Questions from the PROFIsafe Designer Workshop in October 2023: As long as there is no security in the safe fieldbus protocol, the only solution security-wise is to isolate the devices in the network. Is there a plan to solve this by integrating real security (perhaps as an optional feature) into P...
- 10 Nov 2023, 16:29
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: PROFIsafe and Security
- Replies: 1
- Views: 41864
PROFIsafe and Security
Questions from the PROFIsafe Designer Workshop in October 2023: As long as there is no security in the safe fieldbus protocol, the only solution security-wise is to isolate the devices in the network. Is there a plan to solve this by integrating real security (perhaps as an optional feature) into PR...
- 02 Nov 2023, 10:19
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: Is it recommended to support PROFIsafe V2.4 in new devices?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 40991
- 02 Nov 2023, 10:14
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: Is it recommended to support PROFIsafe V2.4 in new devices?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 40991
Is it recommended to support PROFIsafe V2.4 in new devices?
Question from the PROFIsafe Designer Workshop from October 2023:
Is it recommended to support PROFIsafe V2.4 in new devices?
Is it recommended to support PROFIsafe V2.4 in new devices?
- 02 Nov 2023, 10:12
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: What is the "unsigned8 + unsigned8" data type?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 40506
- 02 Nov 2023, 10:12
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: What is the "unsigned8 + unsigned8" data type?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 40506
What is the "unsigned8 + unsigned8" data type?
Question from the PROFIsafe Designer Workshop in October 2023:
What is [the] "unsigned8 + unsigned8" [data type]?
What is [the] "unsigned8 + unsigned8" [data type]?
- 02 Nov 2023, 10:08
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: Estimation of Device Ack Time (DAT) and Host Ack Time (HAT)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 42070
- 02 Nov 2023, 10:07
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: Estimation of Device Ack Time (DAT) and Host Ack Time (HAT)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 42070
Estimation of Device Ack Time (DAT) and Host Ack Time (HAT)
Question from the PROFIsafe Designer Workshop in October 2023:
How to estimate DAT and HAT?
How to estimate DAT and HAT?
- 18 Oct 2023, 15:23
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: F-Parametrization: Relationship PROFIsafe and PROFIdrive
- Replies: 1
- Views: 39916
Question from the PROFIsafe Designer Workshop in October 2023: Is there a similar feature for F-parameterization via PROFIdrive, which have their own way of parameterization, as for non-PROFIdrive devices, which will then use iPar? It this PROFIdrive on PROFIsafe? For parametrization of PROFIdrive ...