Search found 26 matches
- 16 Dec 2024, 11:50
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: PROFIsafe Parameterization in Run (PiR) Feature
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1104
Re: PROFIsafe Parameterization in Run (PiR) Feature
Could you please provide guidance on if the following feature --- PROFIsafe Parameterization in Run (PiR) --- is a mandatory feature for a device certification according to the PROFIsafe V2.6 MU1 / PROFIsafe V2.6 MU2? No, PiR is not a mandatory, but an optional feature. All new features described i...
- 21 Nov 2024, 15:32
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: Why Should the Watchdog Time (F_WD_Time) Not Be More Than 130% the Minimum Time?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1850
Re: Why Should the Watchdog Time (F_WD_Time) Not Be More Than 130% the Minimum Time?
The PROFIsafe Profile states in section 'Adjustment of watchdog times for FSCP 3/1': It is highly recommended that the difference between the assigned parameter value F_WD_Time and the sum (DAT, HAT, and bus transmission delays) does not exceed 30 %. Why is this the case? In section 'Calculation an...
- 21 Nov 2024, 15:29
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: Why Should the Watchdog Time (F_WD_Time) Not Be More Than 130% the Minimum Time?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1850
Why Should the Watchdog Time (F_WD_Time) Not Be More Than 130% the Minimum Time?
The PROFIsafe Profile states in section 'Adjustment of watchdog times for FSCP 3/1':
Why is this the case?It is highly recommended that the difference between the assigned parameter value F_WD_Time and the sum (DAT, HAT, and bus transmission delays) does not exceed 30 %.
- 06 Mar 2024, 08:42
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: FSCP Test Mode
- Replies: 1
- Views: 6972
FSCP Test Mode
The "FSCP Test Mode" is mentioned several times in the PROFIsafe specification, but it is not defined explicitly.
- 30 Nov 2023, 17:48
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: Licence Conditions for PROFIsafe Layer Tester
- Replies: 1
- Views: 13433
Re: Licence Conditions for PROFIsafe Layer Tester
(from PSDW 2023) Is there any license condition on the PROFIsafe Layer Tester? E.g. can it be distributed freely internally in a company ,once it has been purchased by this company or is this restricted to this department/division, which order the Layer Tester? The layer tester may be used freely w...
- 30 Nov 2023, 17:47
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: Licence Conditions for PROFIsafe Layer Tester
- Replies: 1
- Views: 13433
Licence Conditions for PROFIsafe Layer Tester
(from PSDW 2023)
Is there any license condition on the PROFIsafe Layer Tester? E.g. can it be distributed freely internally in a company ,once it has been purchased by this company or is this restricted to this department/division, which order the Layer Tester?
Is there any license condition on the PROFIsafe Layer Tester? E.g. can it be distributed freely internally in a company ,once it has been purchased by this company or is this restricted to this department/division, which order the Layer Tester?
- 30 Nov 2023, 17:45
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: Future of the PCI-based CP1616 Hardware for PROFIsafe Layer Tester
- Replies: 1
- Views: 12619
From PSDW 2023: Are there plans on changing the CP1616 card to some other HW? Today it's very difficult to find a PC with a PCI slot only. PROFIdrive tester tool are changing the test HW to a standard S7-1500 CPU. You say that old PC’s with PCI slots can still be used. Yes, as long our company IT p...
- 30 Nov 2023, 17:41
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: Future of the PCI-based CP1616 Hardware for PROFIsafe Layer Tester
- Replies: 1
- Views: 12619
Future of the PCI-based CP1616 Hardware for PROFIsafe Layer Tester
From PSDW 2023: Are there plans on changing the CP1616 card to some other HW? Today it's very difficult to find a PC with a PCI slot only. PROFIdrive tester tool are changing the test HW to a standard S7-1500 CPU. You say that old PC’s with PCI slots can still be used. Yes, as long our company IT po...
- 13 Nov 2023, 18:07
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: Safe Router?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 14587
- 13 Nov 2023, 18:05
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: Safe Router?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 14587
Safe Router?
Question from the PROFIsafe Designer Workshop in October 2023: Does there exist a "safe router" which can bundle and redistribute safety data? This could be used to, e.g., distribute safety data from one safety function (consisting of senor/logic/actuator) to additionally affected actuator...
- 13 Nov 2023, 17:55
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: Safety-Related LED Indicators?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 14666
- 13 Nov 2023, 17:54
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: Safety-Related LED Indicators?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 14666
Safety-Related LED Indicators?
Question from the PROFIsafe Designer Workshop in October 2023: The PROFIsafe specification mentions the possibility to use an LED on a device to indicate different states. Must this LED be "implemented" in a safety-related way (i.e., to guarantee that it is actually switched on or blinking...
- 13 Nov 2023, 17:45
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: "Communication PFH": What is it, and how is it calculated?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 14333
- 13 Nov 2023, 17:43
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: "Communication PFH": What is it, and how is it calculated?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 14333
"Communication PFH": What is it, and how is it calculated?
Question from the PROFIsafe Designer Workshop in October 2023:
We briefly heard about a "communication PFH" or "allocating the communication PFH values / residual error rates". What is this about? Do we have to calculate this "communication PFH"?
We briefly heard about a "communication PFH" or "allocating the communication PFH values / residual error rates". What is this about? Do we have to calculate this "communication PFH"?
- 13 Nov 2023, 14:11
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: Parameterization in Run (PiR): Benefits and Logic of Safe State
- Replies: 1
- Views: 15002
- 13 Nov 2023, 14:10
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: Parameterization in Run (PiR): Benefits and Logic of Safe State
- Replies: 1
- Views: 15002
Parameterization in Run (PiR): Benefits and Logic of Safe State
Question from the PROFIsafe Designer Workshop in October 2023: Did I understand it correctly that you cannot "circumvent" the "safe state" [editor's note: i.e., externally ensuring the safety of the part of the machinery/plant that is affected by the F-Device on which PiR is perf...
- 10 Nov 2023, 16:33
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: PROFIsafe and Security
- Replies: 1
- Views: 14676
Questions from the PROFIsafe Designer Workshop in October 2023: As long as there is no security in the safe fieldbus protocol, the only solution security-wise is to isolate the devices in the network. Is there a plan to solve this by integrating real security (perhaps as an optional feature) into P...
- 10 Nov 2023, 16:29
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: PROFIsafe and Security
- Replies: 1
- Views: 14676
PROFIsafe and Security
Questions from the PROFIsafe Designer Workshop in October 2023: As long as there is no security in the safe fieldbus protocol, the only solution security-wise is to isolate the devices in the network. Is there a plan to solve this by integrating real security (perhaps as an optional feature) into PR...
- 02 Nov 2023, 10:19
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: Is it recommended to support PROFIsafe V2.4 in new devices?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 15107
- 02 Nov 2023, 10:14
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: Is it recommended to support PROFIsafe V2.4 in new devices?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 15107
Is it recommended to support PROFIsafe V2.4 in new devices?
Question from the PROFIsafe Designer Workshop from October 2023:
Is it recommended to support PROFIsafe V2.4 in new devices?
Is it recommended to support PROFIsafe V2.4 in new devices?
- 02 Nov 2023, 10:12
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: What is the "unsigned8 + unsigned8" data type?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 14644
- 02 Nov 2023, 10:12
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: What is the "unsigned8 + unsigned8" data type?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 14644
What is the "unsigned8 + unsigned8" data type?
Question from the PROFIsafe Designer Workshop in October 2023:
What is [the] "unsigned8 + unsigned8" [data type]?
What is [the] "unsigned8 + unsigned8" [data type]?
- 02 Nov 2023, 10:08
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: Estimation of Device Ack Time (DAT) and Host Ack Time (HAT)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 15080
- 02 Nov 2023, 10:07
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: Estimation of Device Ack Time (DAT) and Host Ack Time (HAT)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 15080
Estimation of Device Ack Time (DAT) and Host Ack Time (HAT)
Question from the PROFIsafe Designer Workshop in October 2023:
How to estimate DAT and HAT?
How to estimate DAT and HAT?
- 18 Oct 2023, 15:23
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: F-Parametrization: Relationship PROFIsafe and PROFIdrive
- Replies: 1
- Views: 15292
Question from the PROFIsafe Designer Workshop in October 2023: Is there a similar feature for F-parameterization via PROFIdrive, which have their own way of parameterization, as for non-PROFIdrive devices, which will then use iPar? It this PROFIdrive on PROFIsafe? For parametrization of PROFIdrive ...
- 18 Oct 2023, 15:19
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: F-Parametrization: Relationship PROFIsafe and PROFIdrive
- Replies: 1
- Views: 15292
F-Parametrization: Relationship PROFIsafe and PROFIdrive
Question from the PROFIsafe Designer Workshop in October 2023: Is there a similar feature for F-parameterization via PROFIdrive, which have their own way of parameterization, as for non-PROFIdrive devices, which will then use iPar? It this PROFIdrive on PROFIsafe? For parametrization of PROFIdrive d...