Search found 23 matches
- 06 Mar 2024, 08:42
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: FSCP Test Mode
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4293
FSCP Test Mode
The "FSCP Test Mode" is mentioned several times in the PROFIsafe specification, but it is not defined explicitly.
- 30 Nov 2023, 17:48
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: Licence Conditions for PROFIsafe Layer Tester
- Replies: 1
- Views: 10347
Re: Licence Conditions for PROFIsafe Layer Tester
(from PSDW 2023) Is there any license condition on the PROFIsafe Layer Tester? E.g. can it be distributed freely internally in a company ,once it has been purchased by this company or is this restricted to this department/division, which order the Layer Tester? The layer tester may be used freely w...
- 30 Nov 2023, 17:47
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: Licence Conditions for PROFIsafe Layer Tester
- Replies: 1
- Views: 10347
Licence Conditions for PROFIsafe Layer Tester
(from PSDW 2023)
Is there any license condition on the PROFIsafe Layer Tester? E.g. can it be distributed freely internally in a company ,once it has been purchased by this company or is this restricted to this department/division, which order the Layer Tester?
Is there any license condition on the PROFIsafe Layer Tester? E.g. can it be distributed freely internally in a company ,once it has been purchased by this company or is this restricted to this department/division, which order the Layer Tester?
- 30 Nov 2023, 17:45
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: Future of the PCI-based CP1616 Hardware for PROFIsafe Layer Tester
- Replies: 1
- Views: 9586
From PSDW 2023: Are there plans on changing the CP1616 card to some other HW? Today it's very difficult to find a PC with a PCI slot only. PROFIdrive tester tool are changing the test HW to a standard S7-1500 CPU. You say that old PC’s with PCI slots can still be used. Yes, as long our company IT p...
- 30 Nov 2023, 17:41
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: Future of the PCI-based CP1616 Hardware for PROFIsafe Layer Tester
- Replies: 1
- Views: 9586
Future of the PCI-based CP1616 Hardware for PROFIsafe Layer Tester
From PSDW 2023: Are there plans on changing the CP1616 card to some other HW? Today it's very difficult to find a PC with a PCI slot only. PROFIdrive tester tool are changing the test HW to a standard S7-1500 CPU. You say that old PC’s with PCI slots can still be used. Yes, as long our company IT po...
- 13 Nov 2023, 18:07
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: Safe Router?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 9521
- 13 Nov 2023, 18:05
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: Safe Router?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 9521
Safe Router?
Question from the PROFIsafe Designer Workshop in October 2023: Does there exist a "safe router" which can bundle and redistribute safety data? This could be used to, e.g., distribute safety data from one safety function (consisting of senor/logic/actuator) to additionally affected actuator...
- 13 Nov 2023, 17:55
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: Safety-Related LED Indicators?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 9498
- 13 Nov 2023, 17:54
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: Safety-Related LED Indicators?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 9498
Safety-Related LED Indicators?
Question from the PROFIsafe Designer Workshop in October 2023: The PROFIsafe specification mentions the possibility to use an LED on a device to indicate different states. Must this LED be "implemented" in a safety-related way (i.e., to guarantee that it is actually switched on or blinking...
- 13 Nov 2023, 17:45
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: "Communication PFH": What is it, and how is it calculated?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 9500
- 13 Nov 2023, 17:43
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: "Communication PFH": What is it, and how is it calculated?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 9500
"Communication PFH": What is it, and how is it calculated?
Question from the PROFIsafe Designer Workshop in October 2023:
We briefly heard about a "communication PFH" or "allocating the communication PFH values / residual error rates". What is this about? Do we have to calculate this "communication PFH"?
We briefly heard about a "communication PFH" or "allocating the communication PFH values / residual error rates". What is this about? Do we have to calculate this "communication PFH"?
- 13 Nov 2023, 14:11
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: Parameterization in Run (PiR): Benefits and Logic of Safe State
- Replies: 1
- Views: 9742
- 13 Nov 2023, 14:10
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: Parameterization in Run (PiR): Benefits and Logic of Safe State
- Replies: 1
- Views: 9742
Parameterization in Run (PiR): Benefits and Logic of Safe State
Question from the PROFIsafe Designer Workshop in October 2023: Did I understand it correctly that you cannot "circumvent" the "safe state" [editor's note: i.e., externally ensuring the safety of the part of the machinery/plant that is affected by the F-Device on which PiR is perf...
- 10 Nov 2023, 16:33
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: PROFIsafe and Security
- Replies: 1
- Views: 9679
Questions from the PROFIsafe Designer Workshop in October 2023: As long as there is no security in the safe fieldbus protocol, the only solution security-wise is to isolate the devices in the network. Is there a plan to solve this by integrating real security (perhaps as an optional feature) into P...
- 10 Nov 2023, 16:29
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: PROFIsafe and Security
- Replies: 1
- Views: 9679
PROFIsafe and Security
Questions from the PROFIsafe Designer Workshop in October 2023: As long as there is no security in the safe fieldbus protocol, the only solution security-wise is to isolate the devices in the network. Is there a plan to solve this by integrating real security (perhaps as an optional feature) into PR...
- 02 Nov 2023, 10:19
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: Is it recommended to support PROFIsafe V2.4 in new devices?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 10150
- 02 Nov 2023, 10:14
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: Is it recommended to support PROFIsafe V2.4 in new devices?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 10150
Is it recommended to support PROFIsafe V2.4 in new devices?
Question from the PROFIsafe Designer Workshop from October 2023:
Is it recommended to support PROFIsafe V2.4 in new devices?
Is it recommended to support PROFIsafe V2.4 in new devices?
- 02 Nov 2023, 10:12
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: What is the "unsigned8 + unsigned8" data type?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 9855
- 02 Nov 2023, 10:12
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: What is the "unsigned8 + unsigned8" data type?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 9855
What is the "unsigned8 + unsigned8" data type?
Question from the PROFIsafe Designer Workshop in October 2023:
What is [the] "unsigned8 + unsigned8" [data type]?
What is [the] "unsigned8 + unsigned8" [data type]?
- 02 Nov 2023, 10:08
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: Estimation of Device Ack Time (DAT) and Host Ack Time (HAT)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 9982
- 02 Nov 2023, 10:07
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: Estimation of Device Ack Time (DAT) and Host Ack Time (HAT)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 9982
Estimation of Device Ack Time (DAT) and Host Ack Time (HAT)
Question from the PROFIsafe Designer Workshop in October 2023:
How to estimate DAT and HAT?
How to estimate DAT and HAT?
- 18 Oct 2023, 15:23
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: F-Parametrization: Relationship PROFIsafe and PROFIdrive
- Replies: 1
- Views: 10062
Question from the PROFIsafe Designer Workshop in October 2023: Is there a similar feature for F-parameterization via PROFIdrive, which have their own way of parameterization, as for non-PROFIdrive devices, which will then use iPar? It this PROFIdrive on PROFIsafe? For parametrization of PROFIdrive ...
- 18 Oct 2023, 15:19
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: F-Parametrization: Relationship PROFIsafe and PROFIdrive
- Replies: 1
- Views: 10062
F-Parametrization: Relationship PROFIsafe and PROFIdrive
Question from the PROFIsafe Designer Workshop in October 2023: Is there a similar feature for F-parameterization via PROFIdrive, which have their own way of parameterization, as for non-PROFIdrive devices, which will then use iPar? It this PROFIdrive on PROFIsafe? For parametrization of PROFIdrive d...