Hi Alfredo, If your customer wants to develop his own APL devices, he will need a couple of things. Lets start with your list: 1) APL switch (useful for interoperability testing) 2) License of SIMATIC Process Control System PCS 7 SIMATIC PDM Readme V9.1 (ONLY IF YOU USE AN DCS) 3) License if TIA Po...

Hello PROFIprocess and APL experts. One of my field device makers customers has a lot of experience in process field devices, but so far has not developed PROFIBUS DP, PROFIBUS PA, PROFINET and let alone APL. I can't say more about this company because of obvious confidentiality considerations. In o...

The Community Stack is not a devkit and should therefore not be seen as code that you can simply "plug" into your existing device. The Community Stack is intended for technology providers and experienced developers who want to act as an "in-house" stack provider. For simple devi...

Hello Community Stack experts. My colleague is trying to build a Linux working PROFINET device application. From there we want to port this Linux version onto other real-time operating systems used by our customers. We are using v00.09.00 of the Profinet Community Stack The makefile is being created...

Hello Profinet experts, currently I'm working with a certification tool from ODVA (CT20) to test our Ethernet/IP device. Unforunately it raises an error "Received LLDP frame from unexpected Source MAC Address: 00:0a:cd:2c:ed:aa". I examined this LLDP frame with Wireshark and see some inte...

Did you try Request Access ? Yes, I did. And it takes be back to the PROFINET Community Stack page. It keeps me going around this cycle. OK, I had to reset the password for the Github and I was able to get in. It was a little confusing because the screens made me believe that just by being logged i...

olliew wrote: ↑25 Jun 2024, 11:48 Did you try Request Access?

Yes, I did. And it takes be back to the PROFINET Community Stack page.
It keeps me going around this cycle.

olliew wrote: ↑25 Jun 2024, 07:58 hello,

Access to the community stack needs to be authorized seperately, see https://de.profibus.com/download/profi ... nity-stack

Thanks a lot. Yes, I try to access this link ( https://de.profibus.com/download/profi ... nity-stack), and please see what happens below:

Hello: Even though I am a registered member of the PI, and am able to download from the profibus.com all available materials, today I tried to access https://gitlab.profibus.com/ , but I was not successful. I get "Invalid login or password. " error. I no not want to reset the password, how...

benja_m wrote: ↑17 Apr 2024, 16:45 Parts of this was fixed in the meantime. Please check with last available Innovation bundle.
https://www.profibus.com/download/profi ... tsn-and-pa

Thanks so much. With this newer 2.44.3 version we do not see this problem.
Alfredo

Hello PROFINET Forum experts. I have a couple of problems. For the other I will start another post. This is strange. With ART 2.44.1 we are testing our solution which now supports I&M5 (the previous version didn't so this is the first time I see this.). The ART is telling me that the GSDML file ...

galtech wrote: ↑01 Apr 2024, 19:18 In the PROFIENT protocol "2023-08-25_PN-Test\PN-Spec\PN-AL-protocol_2722_V24MU4_May23.pdf", the DCP Signal behavior is described in section 4.3.1.4.15. An LED should blink for 3 s with a suggested frequency of 1 Hz.

@galtech, thank you so much.
Alfredo

Hello Profinet Forum colleagues. Again I am going to have to embarrass myself by asking something that I should know, but don't. My customer is developing a PROFINET IO device for a general purpose IO device. I was teaching this customer the use of the ETS and we hit the LED flash test of the manual...

Install the Automated RT Tester and within the installation directory of the Automated RT-Tester (default: "C:\Program Files (x86)\Automated RT-Tester") you find the EtsFirmware folder which contains the fitting EtsFirmware for this version. It was always there and the duplication in the ...

Hi. I cannot find the new firmware for the ETS board in the test bundles provided on the PI site.
I cannot execute the ART, as a result.
Is it possible that the test bundles were updated without the ETS firmware?

cet_someone wrote: ↑23 Nov 2023, 06:55well，after upper conversation, I guess I'm so familiar with the hardware system on which the ART could run OK.
And, again thank you for your patient explaination, deer Alfredo!

You're very welcome, and good luck with this project!

Alright，then I can see, for the whole ART system, actualy not TMDX654IDKEVM board is the only needed hardware, we also need Device B/D to complete the test. for now the profinet device I'm now developping, just up to the requirement of the CC-A/B, and one port only. So could I simplify the system, ...

I've got another two question when I reffer to the manual 《ProductDocumentation.pdf》to the ART system. 1)The system mentioned Decive B(one of Scalance X204 IRT/ Scalance X202-2P IRT) and Device D/E（an ET200SP or ET200MP). Is Device B and D/E is also must be included in the whole test system? If I d...

Hello. I'm so appreciate for your immediate answer！ first, I don't understand what's wrong with the stock.Cause I used to consult with TI's FAE，they told me they could find some stocks online, just the same as you.But when to place an order, something wrong occurred.... :o :o Yes, right now the dev...

as for the topic says, right now TMDX654IDKEVM on TI is out of stock. I've no other ways to get TMDX654IDKEVM. If I want to use TestBundle for some basic pre-tests just like DCP or other consistences, do I have some other ways to solve this? Hello. I just checked in the TI Online store and it seems...

Hi, to my knowledge there are two different versions of the switch out there one forwarding LLDP frames and one IEEE compliant version that does not forward the LLDP frames. The test spec request the E7 (an kind of revision of the switch) which is the older, LLDP forwarding one. Unfortunately, I'm ...

Hi, to my knowledge there are two different versions of the switch out there one forwarding LLDP frames and one IEEE compliant version that does not forward the LLDP frames. The test spec request the E7 (an kind of revision of the switch) which is the older, LLDP forwarding one. Unfortunately, I'm ...

Hello. This is my first post. I have some experience with PROFINET testing. I have a problem. We have two X005 SCALANCES, the part number recommended for the Netload test. One of the switches works as expected. But the other does not work as expected. I explain myself: The standard setup for netload...