This is a very nerdy question and I will not be disappointed if the answer is "no, this is not supported".
On the other hand I will be delighted if this is possible somehow.
The Wireshark traces produced by the ETS of course do not have the correct UTC time of the time the test was executed. I ...
Search found 50 matches
- 12 Jul 2026, 09:19
- Forum: PROFINET Test & Certification
- Topic: ETS clock sync for accurate Wireshark traces time-stamps
- Replies: 0
- Views: 92
- 16 Jun 2026, 02:19
- Forum: PROFINET Test & Certification
- Topic: Will old ETS (TMDX654IDKEVM) be able to support controller test for v2.5 as well as v2.4 tests
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1169
Re: Will old ETS (TMDX654IDKEVM) be able to support controller test for v2.5 as well as v2.4 tests
Hello,
PITL's must use the new IPC instead if the TI IDK, but the Test Bundle V2.50 will contain FW-Images for both, IDK and IPC. Giving the customer the possibility to use the IDK. As you already said, the IDK is not capable to run all provided test cases.
Raik, thanks so much for this ...
- 10 Jun 2026, 07:17
- Forum: PROFINET Test & Certification
- Topic: Will old ETS (TMDX654IDKEVM) be able to support controller test for v2.5 as well as v2.4 tests
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1169
Will old ETS (TMDX654IDKEVM) be able to support controller test for v2.5 as well as v2.4 tests
Hello. The question is as per subject.
Thanks for the confirmation.
I understand that, of course, TMDX654IDKEVM cannot support 1G or 10G, and cannot support IRT test nor netload test.
Thanks for the confirmation.
I understand that, of course, TMDX654IDKEVM cannot support 1G or 10G, and cannot support IRT test nor netload test.
- 05 Jun 2026, 17:39
- Forum: Getting Started - Automated RT Tester
- Topic: ART Tester 2.46.0.205 does not allow selection of SynAccess power outlet
- Replies: 3
- Views: 15261
Re: ART Tester 2.46.0.205 does not allow selection of SynAccess power outlet
Hi Brent, thanks for your answer.
I guess you did not have the time to look at my screenshot which explains that I indeed followed the procedure in the test specification, and yet I am unable to select SynAccess as the power outltet for the test.
Will be grateful for more specific advice. Before I ...
- 01 Jun 2026, 13:06
- Forum: Getting Started - Automated RT Tester
- Topic: ART Tester 2.46.0.205 does not allow selection of SynAccess power outlet
- Replies: 3
- Views: 15261
Re: ART Tester 2.46.0.205 does not allow selection of SynAccess power outlet
Did you follow the direction in the Readme for the "add_on_power-outlet" in the bundle? You have to load a dll to get it to show up.
See the following path in the zip package: ~\2025_08_21_PN-Test-V246\2025_08_21_PN-Test\PN-Test\add_on_power-outlet
Hi Brent, thanks for your answer.
I guess you ...
- 25 May 2026, 10:41
- Forum: Getting Started - Automated RT Tester
- Topic: ART Tester 2.46.0.205 does not allow selection of SynAccess power outlet
- Replies: 3
- Views: 15261
ART Tester 2.46.0.205 does not allow selection of SynAccess power outlet
Hello:
I am trying to setup an ETS project that uses SynAccess power outlet, but the ART would not let me do this.
I have tried to follow the instruction in the documentation.
Reading other posts and checking the documentation I realize there is no registry entry in Computer\HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE ...
I am trying to setup an ETS project that uses SynAccess power outlet, but the ART would not let me do this.
I have tried to follow the instruction in the documentation.
Reading other posts and checking the documentation I realize there is no registry entry in Computer\HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE ...
- 09 Apr 2026, 06:58
- Forum: PROFIprocess
- Topic: Acyclic access for pressure value of a PA Profile APL pressure transmitter
- Replies: 7
- Views: 29049
Re: Acyclic access for pressure value of a PA Profile APL pressure transmitter
I have also tried to access index 0xB00E, "PROCESS VARIABLE" parameter for Analog Input Block as per PA profile which is mandatory according to this standard. Tried slot/subslot 1/1 and 0/1, but in all cases I get nca_unk_if. I wonder whether I am doing something incorrectly or whether this device ...
- 07 Apr 2026, 09:45
- Forum: PROFIprocess
- Topic: Acyclic access for pressure value of a PA Profile APL pressure transmitter
- Replies: 7
- Views: 29049
Re: Acyclic access for pressure value of a PA Profile APL pressure transmitter
It seems the request is too shorts. The IODReadReqHeader should contain 8 padding bytes after the TargetARUUID which seem to be missing in screenshot. That could be cause for completely missing reaction of the device.
Benja_m, hello again. I was not able to work on this issue in the last week ...
- 06 Apr 2026, 11:24
- Forum: PROFIprocess
- Topic: Acyclic access for pressure value of a PA Profile APL pressure transmitter
- Replies: 7
- Views: 29049
Re: Acyclic access for pressure value of a PA Profile APL pressure transmitter
It seems the request is too shorts. The IODReadReqHeader should contain 8 padding bytes after the TargetARUUID which seem to be missing in screenshot. That could be cause for completely missing reaction of the device.
Benja_m, hello again. I was not able to work on this issue in the last week ...
- 23 Mar 2026, 09:25
- Forum: PROFIprocess
- Topic: Acyclic access for pressure value of a PA Profile APL pressure transmitter
- Replies: 7
- Views: 29049
Re: Acyclic access for pressure value of a PA Profile APL pressure transmitter
Hello PROFINET Forum experts.
I have a customer who intends to use a PROFINET controller capable DCS (not a Siemens DCS) to monitor some PROFINET APL devices (pressure transmitters, etc.), in a pretty much plain-vanilla PROFINET over APL application. The devices are of course PA Profile ...
- 20 Mar 2026, 05:55
- Forum: PROFIprocess
- Topic: Acyclic access for pressure value of a PA Profile APL pressure transmitter
- Replies: 7
- Views: 29049
Acyclic access for pressure value of a PA Profile APL pressure transmitter
Hello PROFINET Forum experts.
I have a customer who intends to use a PROFINET controller capable DCS (not a Siemens DCS) to monitor some PROFINET APL devices (pressure transmitters, etc.), in a pretty much plain-vanilla PROFINET over APL application. The devices are of course PA Profile compliant ...
I have a customer who intends to use a PROFINET controller capable DCS (not a Siemens DCS) to monitor some PROFINET APL devices (pressure transmitters, etc.), in a pretty much plain-vanilla PROFINET over APL application. The devices are of course PA Profile compliant ...
- 23 Jan 2026, 02:02
- Forum: PROFINET Test & Certification
- Topic: AL Protocol Spec, Table 112 - IP Address, "IP Address may be accepted but should be valid"
- Replies: 2
- Views: 13668
Re: AL Protocol Spec, Table 112 - IP Address, "IP Address may be accepted but should be valid"
Thank you so much for the follow-up, and for your patience with my inquires.Raik.Zachmann wrote: ↑20 Jan 2026, 07:43 Dear Alfredo,
thanks for bringing this up. We put a comment on these lines in the current PI-Review and asked for the expected behavior.
Best regards,
Raik
- 15 Jan 2026, 09:52
- Forum: PROFINET Test & Certification
- Topic: AL Protocol Spec, Table 112 - IP Address, "IP Address may be accepted but should be valid"
- Replies: 2
- Views: 13668
AL Protocol Spec, Table 112 - IP Address, "IP Address may be accepted but should be valid"
Hello PI Forum colleagues:
I am at a loss in the interpretation of this clause. Since in the future compliance with this clause may be added to the ART as per post https://forum.profinet.com/viewtopic.php?t=1260&sid=1926d17fe37e97e6c7845a4f115f8ef5 ( Is there a test case that enforces 4.3.1.4.21.2 ...
I am at a loss in the interpretation of this clause. Since in the future compliance with this clause may be added to the ART as per post https://forum.profinet.com/viewtopic.php?t=1260&sid=1926d17fe37e97e6c7845a4f115f8ef5 ( Is there a test case that enforces 4.3.1.4.21.2 ...
- 15 Jan 2026, 03:54
- Forum: Community Stack
- Topic: CS with FreeRTOS+lwIP and memory requirements
- Replies: 3
- Views: 13022
Re: CS with FreeRTOS+lwIP and memory requirements
Hi everyone,
We've recently downloaded the Community Stack source code, and now we are performing tests and evaluating the results to create a proof of concept prototype.
Community Stack targets a Linux system, but we are planning in using FreeRTOS + lwIP. Given the complexity of our (future ...
- 14 Jan 2026, 06:02
- Forum: Basics
- Topic: Is Name Of Station value "port-000" a permitted value
- Replies: 3
- Views: 13658
Re: Is Name Of Station value "port-000" a permitted value
Hello Alfredo,
you found an inconsistency between the Protocol and Service Specification. As the PROFINET Specifications are currently in PI review phase, I would kindly ask you to directly submit a change request.
Many thanks.
Best regards,
Raik
Hello Raik. Thanks so much for your prompt ...
- 13 Jan 2026, 03:28
- Forum: Basics
- Topic: Is Name Of Station value "port-000" a permitted value
- Replies: 3
- Views: 13658
Is Name Of Station value "port-000" a permitted value
Hello Test & Certification colleagues. As always, I am so grateful for your support.
I have this one question, and forgive my lack of understanding of the specification. I am testing a device that DOES NOT allow setting of Name Of Station value of "port-000" through DCP client such as Proneta or ...
I have this one question, and forgive my lack of understanding of the specification. I am testing a device that DOES NOT allow setting of Name Of Station value of "port-000" through DCP client such as Proneta or ...
- 19 Dec 2025, 02:06
- Forum: PROFINET Test & Certification
- Topic: Is there a test case that enforces 4.3.1.4.21.2 Coding of the field IPAddress?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 12690
Re: Is there a test case that enforces 4.3.1.4.21.2 Coding of the field IPAddress?
Hello Alfredo,
there is currently no specific test for such IP parameters in the Automated RT-Tester. We will add this topic to the backlog of the TSDG to make sure we cover it in the future.
Thanks a lot for reporting and best regards,
Benedikt
Hello:
We came across a PROFINET IO device ...
- 16 Dec 2025, 03:25
- Forum: PROFINET Test & Certification
- Topic: Is there a test case that enforces 4.3.1.4.21.2 Coding of the field IPAddress?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 12690
Is there a test case that enforces 4.3.1.4.21.2 Coding of the field IPAddress?
Hello:
We came across a PROFINET IO device which we are testing. For this device the ART test cases pass for all the functionalities described in its GSDML file.
However, it is possible, with a DCP client tool such as PRONETA or PROFINET Commander, to set "forbidden" IP addresses as described in ...
We came across a PROFINET IO device which we are testing. For this device the ART test cases pass for all the functionalities described in its GSDML file.
However, it is possible, with a DCP client tool such as PRONETA or PROFINET Commander, to set "forbidden" IP addresses as described in ...
- 06 Nov 2025, 01:18
- Forum: PROFINET Test & Certification
- Topic: Is it possible to use Siemens 6GK1162-3AA00 (PCI express) for the IRT test setup?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 24138
Re: Is it possible to use Siemens 6GK1162-3AA00 (PCI express) for the IRT test setup?
Thanks so very much for this confirmation, Raik.Raik.Zachmann wrote: ↑05 Nov 2025, 14:15
Hello Alfredo,
the to be used test tool for IRT (SPIRTA) only supports the PCI card CP1616.
Best regards,
Raik
- 05 Nov 2025, 02:21
- Forum: PROFINET Test & Certification
- Topic: Is it possible to use Siemens 6GK1162-3AA00 (PCI express) for the IRT test setup?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 24138
Is it possible to use Siemens 6GK1162-3AA00 (PCI express) for the IRT test setup?
Hello:
The IRT test setup specifies SIEMENS CP1616, MLFB 6GK1161-6AA02 (PCI) device.
But because it is currently very difficult to find computers with PCI slots, I am wondering whether 6GK1162-3AA00 (PCI express) can be used or not for this test.
https://sieportal.siemens.com/en-ww/products ...
The IRT test setup specifies SIEMENS CP1616, MLFB 6GK1161-6AA02 (PCI) device.
But because it is currently very difficult to find computers with PCI slots, I am wondering whether 6GK1162-3AA00 (PCI express) can be used or not for this test.
https://sieportal.siemens.com/en-ww/products ...
- 06 Feb 2025, 10:49
- Forum: Quality and Feedback
- Topic: ETS and Windows PC running ART for Ethernet dump's timestamp synchronization
- Replies: 2
- Views: 108506
Re: ETS and Windows PC running ART for Ethernet dump's timestamp synchronization
No such possibility exists today. Currently, the easiest way is to use the timestamps in the report with the timestamps of the logs.
I will take it as a proposal for the backlog of the TSDG with me.
The main problem for this is actually technical: The application clock (CPU clock) of the ETS is ...
- 06 Feb 2025, 02:51
- Forum: Quality and Feedback
- Topic: ETS and Windows PC running ART for Ethernet dump's timestamp synchronization
- Replies: 2
- Views: 108506
ETS and Windows PC running ART for Ethernet dump's timestamp synchronization
Hello. I have read the ETS_HW_manual document and still cannot figure out if there is a way to synchronise the Embedded Test System's clock with the Windows PC running ART, so that the time stamps as recorded in the Ethernet dumps correspond more or less to the time that the Windows PC's operating ...
- 06 Feb 2025, 01:55
- Forum: Miscellaneous
- Topic: GSDML Spec, SNMP_FeaturesSupported, "is removed???"
- Replies: 7
- Views: 146283
Re: GSDML Spec, SNMP_FeaturesSupported, "is removed???"
The GSDML Checker internally uses the TIA Portal GSD checking library for validating the provided GSDML. Can you send me please the unaltered GSDML via mail with which you had the issues?
The mail would be [email protected]
Thanks very much for your response. I have e-mailed my answer to ...
- 16 Jan 2025, 09:14
- Forum: Miscellaneous
- Topic: GSDML Spec, SNMP_FeaturesSupported, "is removed???"
- Replies: 7
- Views: 146283
Re: GSDML Spec, SNMP_FeaturesSupported, "is removed???"
My request for advice to forum colleagues, what should I do? Is there any support contact for Siemens for this kind of problem. I do not know if Siemens will support us, because our SDK is not based in Siemens SDK. We use a different stack provider.
Will be very grateful for your words of advice ...
- 10 Jan 2025, 08:00
- Forum: Miscellaneous
- Topic: GSDML Spec, SNMP_FeaturesSupported, "is removed???"
- Replies: 7
- Views: 146283
Re: GSDML Spec, SNMP_FeaturesSupported, "is removed???"
Your quote refers to the CIM interface (which is something different than the InterfaceSubmodulItem).
As far as i can see, the mentioned example GSDML file does not state to support CIM.
benja_m and other colleagues, hello again.
The reason I got confused and prompted me to do the original post ...
- 08 Jan 2025, 08:54
- Forum: Miscellaneous
- Topic: GSDML Spec, SNMP_FeaturesSupported, "is removed???"
- Replies: 7
- Views: 146283
Re: GSDML Spec, SNMP_FeaturesSupported, "is removed???"
Your quote refers to the CIM interface (which is something different than the InterfaceSubmodulItem).
As far as i can see, the mentioned example GSDML file does not state to support CIM.
Hello benja_m.
I now realize my mistake. Thanks you very much. The reference is for DCP_FeaturesSupported ...
- 08 Jan 2025, 04:22
- Forum: Miscellaneous
- Topic: GSDML Spec, SNMP_FeaturesSupported, "is removed???"
- Replies: 7
- Views: 146283
GSDML Spec, SNMP_FeaturesSupported, "is removed???"
Hello, colleagues of the PROFINET forum. Yet once again I ask for your help so I can better understand one corner of the specification. We are updating our SDK and as I was adding the security functionalities to our sample application, I am kind of stunned to read from the "GSDML-Spec_2352_V245 ...
- 24 Sep 2024, 14:20
- Forum: PROFIprocess
- Topic: APL equipment for a complete "newby" for APL device development
- Replies: 2
- Views: 112136
Re: APL equipment for a complete "newby" for APL device development
Hi Alfredo,
If your customer wants to develop his own APL devices, he will need a couple of things. Lets start with your list:
1) APL switch (useful for interoperability testing)
2) License of SIMATIC Process Control System PCS 7 SIMATIC PDM Readme V9.1 (ONLY IF YOU USE AN DCS)
3 ...
- 28 Aug 2024, 08:03
- Forum: PROFIprocess
- Topic: APL equipment for a complete "newby" for APL device development
- Replies: 2
- Views: 112136
APL equipment for a complete "newby" for APL device development
Hello PROFIprocess and APL experts.
One of my field device makers customers has a lot of experience in process field devices, but so far has not developed PROFIBUS DP, PROFIBUS PA, PROFINET and let alone APL. I can't say more about this company because of obvious confidentiality considerations.
In ...
One of my field device makers customers has a lot of experience in process field devices, but so far has not developed PROFIBUS DP, PROFIBUS PA, PROFINET and let alone APL. I can't say more about this company because of obvious confidentiality considerations.
In ...
- 15 Jul 2024, 08:40
- Forum: Community Stack
- Topic: Community stack, can't find the code for the "main" function
- Replies: 2
- Views: 146
Re: Community stack, can't find the code for the "main" function
The Community Stack is not a devkit and should therefore not be seen as code that you can simply "plug" into your existing device. The Community Stack is intended for technology providers and experienced developers who want to act as an "in-house" stack provider. For simple device integration, it ...