Search found 46 matches
- 01 Jun 2026, 13:06
- Forum: Getting Started - Automated RT Tester
- Topic: ART Tester 2.46.0.205 does not allow selection of SynAccess power outlet
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3173
Re: ART Tester 2.46.0.205 does not allow selection of SynAccess power outlet
Did you follow the direction in the Readme for the "add_on_power-outlet" in the bundle? You have to load a dll to get it to show up. See the following path in the zip package: ~\2025_08_21_PN-Test-V246\2025_08_21_PN-Test\PN-Test\add_on_power-outlet Hi Brent, thanks for your answer. I gues...
- 25 May 2026, 10:41
- Forum: Getting Started - Automated RT Tester
- Topic: ART Tester 2.46.0.205 does not allow selection of SynAccess power outlet
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3173
ART Tester 2.46.0.205 does not allow selection of SynAccess power outlet
Hello: I am trying to setup an ETS project that uses SynAccess power outlet, but the ART would not let me do this. I have tried to follow the instruction in the documentation. Reading other posts and checking the documentation I realize there is no registry entry in Computer\HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTW...
- 09 Apr 2026, 06:58
- Forum: PROFIprocess
- Topic: Acyclic access for pressure value of a PA Profile APL pressure transmitter
- Replies: 7
- Views: 12194
Re: Acyclic access for pressure value of a PA Profile APL pressure transmitter
I have also tried to access index 0xB00E, "PROCESS VARIABLE" parameter for Analog Input Block as per PA profile which is mandatory according to this standard. Tried slot/subslot 1/1 and 0/1, but in all cases I get nca_unk_if. I wonder whether I am doing something incorrectly or whether th...
- 07 Apr 2026, 09:45
- Forum: PROFIprocess
- Topic: Acyclic access for pressure value of a PA Profile APL pressure transmitter
- Replies: 7
- Views: 12194
Re: Acyclic access for pressure value of a PA Profile APL pressure transmitter
It seems the request is too shorts. The IODReadReqHeader should contain 8 padding bytes after the TargetARUUID which seem to be missing in screenshot. That could be cause for completely missing reaction of the device. Benja_m, hello again. I was not able to work on this issue in the last week or so...
- 06 Apr 2026, 11:24
- Forum: PROFIprocess
- Topic: Acyclic access for pressure value of a PA Profile APL pressure transmitter
- Replies: 7
- Views: 12194
Re: Acyclic access for pressure value of a PA Profile APL pressure transmitter
It seems the request is too shorts. The IODReadReqHeader should contain 8 padding bytes after the TargetARUUID which seem to be missing in screenshot. That could be cause for completely missing reaction of the device. Benja_m, hello again. I was not able to work on this issue in the last week or so...
- 23 Mar 2026, 09:25
- Forum: PROFIprocess
- Topic: Acyclic access for pressure value of a PA Profile APL pressure transmitter
- Replies: 7
- Views: 12194
Re: Acyclic access for pressure value of a PA Profile APL pressure transmitter
Hello PROFINET Forum experts. I have a customer who intends to use a PROFINET controller capable DCS (not a Siemens DCS) to monitor some PROFINET APL devices (pressure transmitters, etc.), in a pretty much plain-vanilla PROFINET over APL application. The devices are of course PA Profile compliant. ...
- 20 Mar 2026, 05:55
- Forum: PROFIprocess
- Topic: Acyclic access for pressure value of a PA Profile APL pressure transmitter
- Replies: 7
- Views: 12194
Acyclic access for pressure value of a PA Profile APL pressure transmitter
Hello PROFINET Forum experts. I have a customer who intends to use a PROFINET controller capable DCS (not a Siemens DCS) to monitor some PROFINET APL devices (pressure transmitters, etc.), in a pretty much plain-vanilla PROFINET over APL application. The devices are of course PA Profile compliant. B...
- 23 Jan 2026, 02:02
- Forum: PROFINET Test & Certification
- Topic: AL Protocol Spec, Table 112 - IP Address, "IP Address may be accepted but should be valid"
- Replies: 2
- Views: 7095
Re: AL Protocol Spec, Table 112 - IP Address, "IP Address may be accepted but should be valid"
Thank you so much for the follow-up, and for your patience with my inquires.Raik.Zachmann wrote: ↑20 Jan 2026, 07:43 Dear Alfredo,
thanks for bringing this up. We put a comment on these lines in the current PI-Review and asked for the expected behavior.
Best regards,
Raik
- 15 Jan 2026, 09:52
- Forum: PROFINET Test & Certification
- Topic: AL Protocol Spec, Table 112 - IP Address, "IP Address may be accepted but should be valid"
- Replies: 2
- Views: 7095
AL Protocol Spec, Table 112 - IP Address, "IP Address may be accepted but should be valid"
Hello PI Forum colleagues: I am at a loss in the interpretation of this clause. Since in the future compliance with this clause may be added to the ART as per post https://forum.profinet.com/viewtopic.php?t=1260&sid=1926d17fe37e97e6c7845a4f115f8ef5 ( Is there a test case that enforces 4.3.1.4.21...
- 15 Jan 2026, 03:54
- Forum: Community Stack
- Topic: CS with FreeRTOS+lwIP and memory requirements
- Replies: 3
- Views: 7414
Re: CS with FreeRTOS+lwIP and memory requirements
Hi everyone, We've recently downloaded the Community Stack source code, and now we are performing tests and evaluating the results to create a proof of concept prototype. Community Stack targets a Linux system, but we are planning in using FreeRTOS + lwIP. Given the complexity of our (future) produ...
- 14 Jan 2026, 06:02
- Forum: Basics
- Topic: Is Name Of Station value "port-000" a permitted value
- Replies: 3
- Views: 7387
Re: Is Name Of Station value "port-000" a permitted value
Hello Alfredo, you found an inconsistency between the Protocol and Service Specification. As the PROFINET Specifications are currently in PI review phase, I would kindly ask you to directly submit a change request. Many thanks. Best regards, Raik Hello Raik. Thanks so much for your prompt reply. Ve...
- 13 Jan 2026, 03:28
- Forum: Basics
- Topic: Is Name Of Station value "port-000" a permitted value
- Replies: 3
- Views: 7387
Is Name Of Station value "port-000" a permitted value
Hello Test & Certification colleagues. As always, I am so grateful for your support. I have this one question, and forgive my lack of understanding of the specification. I am testing a device that DOES NOT allow setting of Name Of Station value of "port-000" through DCP client such as ...
- 19 Dec 2025, 02:06
- Forum: PROFINET Test & Certification
- Topic: Is there a test case that enforces 4.3.1.4.21.2 Coding of the field IPAddress?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 6719
Re: Is there a test case that enforces 4.3.1.4.21.2 Coding of the field IPAddress?
Hello Alfredo, there is currently no specific test for such IP parameters in the Automated RT-Tester. We will add this topic to the backlog of the TSDG to make sure we cover it in the future. Thanks a lot for reporting and best regards, Benedikt Hello: We came across a PROFINET IO device which we a...
- 16 Dec 2025, 03:25
- Forum: PROFINET Test & Certification
- Topic: Is there a test case that enforces 4.3.1.4.21.2 Coding of the field IPAddress?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 6719
Is there a test case that enforces 4.3.1.4.21.2 Coding of the field IPAddress?
Hello: We came across a PROFINET IO device which we are testing. For this device the ART test cases pass for all the functionalities described in its GSDML file. However, it is possible, with a DCP client tool such as PRONETA or PROFINET Commander, to set "forbidden" IP addresses as descri...
- 06 Nov 2025, 01:18
- Forum: PROFINET Test & Certification
- Topic: Is it possible to use Siemens 6GK1162-3AA00 (PCI express) for the IRT test setup?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 17633
Re: Is it possible to use Siemens 6GK1162-3AA00 (PCI express) for the IRT test setup?
Thanks so very much for this confirmation, Raik.Raik.Zachmann wrote: ↑05 Nov 2025, 14:15
Hello Alfredo,
the to be used test tool for IRT (SPIRTA) only supports the PCI card CP1616.
Best regards,
Raik
- 05 Nov 2025, 02:21
- Forum: PROFINET Test & Certification
- Topic: Is it possible to use Siemens 6GK1162-3AA00 (PCI express) for the IRT test setup?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 17633
Is it possible to use Siemens 6GK1162-3AA00 (PCI express) for the IRT test setup?
Hello: The IRT test setup specifies SIEMENS CP1616, MLFB 6GK1161-6AA02 (PCI) device. But because it is currently very difficult to find computers with PCI slots, I am wondering whether 6GK1162-3AA00 (PCI express) can be used or not for this test. https://sieportal.siemens.com/en-ww/products-services...
- 06 Feb 2025, 10:49
- Forum: Quality and Feedback
- Topic: ETS and Windows PC running ART for Ethernet dump's timestamp synchronization
- Replies: 2
- Views: 103509
Re: ETS and Windows PC running ART for Ethernet dump's timestamp synchronization
No such possibility exists today. Currently, the easiest way is to use the timestamps in the report with the timestamps of the logs. I will take it as a proposal for the backlog of the TSDG with me. The main problem for this is actually technical: The application clock (CPU clock) of the ETS is use...
- 06 Feb 2025, 02:51
- Forum: Quality and Feedback
- Topic: ETS and Windows PC running ART for Ethernet dump's timestamp synchronization
- Replies: 2
- Views: 103509
ETS and Windows PC running ART for Ethernet dump's timestamp synchronization
Hello. I have read the ETS_HW_manual document and still cannot figure out if there is a way to synchronise the Embedded Test System's clock with the Windows PC running ART, so that the time stamps as recorded in the Ethernet dumps correspond more or less to the time that the Windows PC's operating s...
- 06 Feb 2025, 01:55
- Forum: Miscellaneous
- Topic: GSDML Spec, SNMP_FeaturesSupported, "is removed???"
- Replies: 7
- Views: 137749
Re: GSDML Spec, SNMP_FeaturesSupported, "is removed???"
The GSDML Checker internally uses the TIA Portal GSD checking library for validating the provided GSDML. Can you send me please the unaltered GSDML via mail with which you had the issues? The mail would be pn-ts-support@oth-aw.de Thanks very much for your response. I have e-mailed my answer to the ...
- 16 Jan 2025, 09:14
- Forum: Miscellaneous
- Topic: GSDML Spec, SNMP_FeaturesSupported, "is removed???"
- Replies: 7
- Views: 137749
Re: GSDML Spec, SNMP_FeaturesSupported, "is removed???"
My request for advice to forum colleagues, what should I do? Is there any support contact for Siemens for this kind of problem. I do not know if Siemens will support us, because our SDK is not based in Siemens SDK. We use a different stack provider. Will be very grateful for your words of advice. T...
- 10 Jan 2025, 08:00
- Forum: Miscellaneous
- Topic: GSDML Spec, SNMP_FeaturesSupported, "is removed???"
- Replies: 7
- Views: 137749
Re: GSDML Spec, SNMP_FeaturesSupported, "is removed???"
Your quote refers to the CIM interface (which is something different than the InterfaceSubmodulItem). As far as i can see, the mentioned example GSDML file does not state to support CIM. benja_m and other colleagues, hello again. The reason I got confused and prompted me to do the original post, is...
- 08 Jan 2025, 08:54
- Forum: Miscellaneous
- Topic: GSDML Spec, SNMP_FeaturesSupported, "is removed???"
- Replies: 7
- Views: 137749
Re: GSDML Spec, SNMP_FeaturesSupported, "is removed???"
Your quote refers to the CIM interface (which is something different than the InterfaceSubmodulItem). As far as i can see, the mentioned example GSDML file does not state to support CIM. Hello benja_m. I now realize my mistake. Thanks you very much. The reference is for DCP_FeaturesSupported, not f...
- 08 Jan 2025, 04:22
- Forum: Miscellaneous
- Topic: GSDML Spec, SNMP_FeaturesSupported, "is removed???"
- Replies: 7
- Views: 137749
GSDML Spec, SNMP_FeaturesSupported, "is removed???"
Hello, colleagues of the PROFINET forum. Yet once again I ask for your help so I can better understand one corner of the specification. We are updating our SDK and as I was adding the security functionalities to our sample application, I am kind of stunned to read from the "GSDML-Spec_2352_V245...
- 24 Sep 2024, 14:20
- Forum: PROFIprocess
- Topic: APL equipment for a complete "newby" for APL device development
- Replies: 2
- Views: 106959
Re: APL equipment for a complete "newby" for APL device development
Hi Alfredo, If your customer wants to develop his own APL devices, he will need a couple of things. Lets start with your list: 1) APL switch (useful for interoperability testing) 2) License of SIMATIC Process Control System PCS 7 SIMATIC PDM Readme V9.1 (ONLY IF YOU USE AN DCS) 3) License if TIA Po...
- 28 Aug 2024, 08:03
- Forum: PROFIprocess
- Topic: APL equipment for a complete "newby" for APL device development
- Replies: 2
- Views: 106959
APL equipment for a complete "newby" for APL device development
Hello PROFIprocess and APL experts. One of my field device makers customers has a lot of experience in process field devices, but so far has not developed PROFIBUS DP, PROFIBUS PA, PROFINET and let alone APL. I can't say more about this company because of obvious confidentiality considerations. In o...
- 15 Jul 2024, 08:40
- Forum: PROFINET Implementation
- Topic: Community stack, can't find the code for the "main" function
- Replies: 2
- Views: 38415
Re: Community stack, can't find the code for the "main" function
The Community Stack is not a devkit and should therefore not be seen as code that you can simply "plug" into your existing device. The Community Stack is intended for technology providers and experienced developers who want to act as an "in-house" stack provider. For simple devi...
- 10 Jul 2024, 11:54
- Forum: PROFINET Implementation
- Topic: Community stack, can't find the code for the "main" function
- Replies: 2
- Views: 38415
Community stack, can't find the code for the "main" function
Hello Community Stack experts. My colleague is trying to build a Linux working PROFINET device application. From there we want to port this Linux version onto other real-time operating systems used by our customers. We are using v00.09.00 of the Profinet Community Stack The makefile is being created...
- 10 Jul 2024, 11:43
- Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
- Topic: Unexpected LLDP frame from "PROFIBUS" TLV?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 57062
Re: Unexpected LLDP frame from "PROFIBUS" TLV?
Hello Profinet experts, currently I'm working with a certification tool from ODVA (CT20) to test our Ethernet/IP device. Unforunately it raises an error "Received LLDP frame from unexpected Source MAC Address: 00:0a:cd:2c:ed:aa". I examined this LLDP frame with Wireshark and see some inte...
- 26 Jun 2024, 03:45
- Forum: PROFINET Implementation
- Topic: "Invalid login or password." at "https://gitlab.profibus.com/"
- Replies: 5
- Views: 67702
Re: "Invalid login or password." at "https://gitlab.profibus.com/"
Did you try Request Access ? Yes, I did. And it takes be back to the PROFINET Community Stack page. It keeps me going around this cycle. OK, I had to reset the password for the Github and I was able to get in. It was a little confusing because the screens made me believe that just by being logged i...
- 25 Jun 2024, 11:56
- Forum: PROFINET Implementation
- Topic: "Invalid login or password." at "https://gitlab.profibus.com/"
- Replies: 5
- Views: 67702