Hello everyone,

in which cases are the tests with P2P-Setup mandatory? Are these testcases required for certification with 2 or more port devices? (Especially "Different Access Ways P2P" because in list of test specification these test is not listed (Pn-Spec 2021))

Thanks for your answers!

Hello everyone, if have a simple question. Did the test fail in Faulty and Normal mode if one of the two output bits "Qx_Error.." is set? I ran the test with a new device and after the test the device works fine, but the error bits were set in Faulty Mode. (Test was executed with specifica...

For all readers,

the meaning of the time for the permitted maximum watchdog time corresponds to the device acknowledgement time and not the device cycle time. There is an error in the documentation.

Hi Booster, the layer tester establishes a connection to the device and starts safety data exchange. At a specific point the togglebit is not changed anymore and this results in a F_WD_Timeout. This happens a few times and the tester is calculating the time between stop changing togglebit and the c...

Hi Booster, no these are two different Times. The Device-Cycle-Time is the cycle time the time the device communicates with the F-Host e.g. 1ms. The Device-Acknowledgment-Time is the time the device needs to react on a changed MonitoringNumber (MNR). There is no other time included such as transmis...

The PROFIsafe Tests include tests with the Safetylayer-Tester. In documentation of Safetylayer-Tester, the watchdog test is required for certification. It should be checked whether the measured times are within tolerance. Maximum value = ((watchdog value + 10%) + device cycle time + inaccuracy of m...

The PROFIsafe Tests include tests with the Safetylayer-Tester. In documentation of Safetylayer-Tester, the watchdog test is required for certification. It should be checked whether the measured times are within tolerance. Maximum value = ((watchdog value + 10%) + device cycle time + inaccuracy of me...

Hello everyone, I have a question about the non-profinet-neighbor test cases with the ETS board (ART tester version 2.44.1.2) If I have understood the test specification correctly, the non-profinet neighbors are simulated. So no additional hardware is required. With the current ART-Tester version, ...

Hello everyone, I have a question about the non-profinet-neighbor test cases with the ETS board (ART tester version 2.44.1.2) If I have understood the test specification correctly, the non-profinet neighbors are simulated. So no additional hardware is required. With the current ART-Tester version, t...