Search found 13 matches
- 16 May 2025, 09:43
- Forum: PROFINET Test & Certification
- Topic: Spirta + CP1616 testing - Synchronous AR
- Replies: 1
- Views: 6121
Re: Spirta + CP1616 testing - Synchronous AR
Hello, We have a drive connected to a PC equipped with CP1616 and Spirta. We bought the CP1616 to test the drive before going to a PROFINET lab and try the certification (RT and IRT). I was expecting Spirta to establish a synchronous communication with the drive (for example in test Syncslave01_WFU...
- 16 May 2025, 09:38
- Forum: Security and Certification
- Topic: P2P-Setup Tests for Certification mandatory?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3574
Re: P2P-Setup Tests for Certification mandatory?
Hello everyone, in which cases are the tests with P2P-Setup mandatory? Are these testcases required for certification with 2 or more port devices? (Especially "Different Access Ways P2P" because in list of test specification these test is not listed (Pn-Spec 2021)) Thanks for your answers...
- 16 May 2025, 09:35
- Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
- Topic: SL1 Device Test Fail-conditions
- Replies: 1
- Views: 491
Re: SL1 Device Test Fail-conditions
Hello everyone, if have a simple question. Did the test fail in Faulty and Normal mode if one of the two output bits "Qx_Error.." is set? I ran the test with a new device and after the test the device works fine, but the error bits were set in Faulty Mode. (Test was executed with specific...
- 09 Apr 2025, 09:13
- Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
- Topic: AR-ASE S2 test failed
- Replies: 3
- Views: 56565
Re: AR-ASE S2 test failed
Hello, I need a helping hand concerning above mentioned test. My device is failing when I run AR-ASE S2 test, in the beginning of Scenario 1-4. Behavior 8, 9, 10 and 11, right in the sequence, are failing as well. AR-ASE and other behavior tests are ok. Log shows the following messages: 14:40:11 - ...
- 26 Mar 2025, 09:59
- Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
- Topic: AR-ASE S2 test failed
- Replies: 3
- Views: 56565
Re: AR-ASE S2 test failed
Hello, I need a helping hand concerning above mentioned test. My device is failing when I run AR-ASE S2 test, in the beginning of Scenario 1-4. Behavior 8, 9, 10 and 11, right in the sequence, are failing as well. AR-ASE and other behavior tests are ok. Log shows the following messages: 14:40:11 - ...
- 13 Dec 2024, 12:58
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: PROFIsafe Watchdog tolerance
- Replies: 8
- Views: 255626
Re: PROFIsafe Watchdog tolerance
Hey Daniel, thank you for your answer! How are the wd_min and wd_max values measured in detail? Is the watchdog started and then monitored cyclically to determine whether it has been triggered? (wd_max) And how is the wd_min value measured? Thank you very much in advance for your answer! Hi Booster...
- 02 Dec 2024, 09:24
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: PROFIsafe Watchdog tolerance
- Replies: 8
- Views: 255626
Re: PROFIsafe Watchdog tolerance
Hi Booster, no these are two different Times. The Device-Cycle-Time is the cycle time the time the device communicates with the F-Host e.g. 1ms. The Device-Acknowledgment-Time is the time the device needs to react on a changed MonitoringNumber (MNR). There is no other time included such as transmis...
- 28 Nov 2024, 12:47
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: PROFIsafe Watchdog tolerance
- Replies: 8
- Views: 255626
Re: PROFIsafe Watchdog tolerance
The PROFIsafe Tests include tests with the Safetylayer-Tester. In documentation of Safetylayer-Tester, the watchdog test is required for certification. It should be checked whether the measured times are within tolerance. Maximum value = ((watchdog value + 10%) + device cycle time + inaccuracy of m...
- 27 Nov 2024, 13:46
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: PROFIsafe Watchdog tolerance
- Replies: 8
- Views: 255626
Re: PROFIsafe Watchdog tolerance
The PROFIsafe Tests include tests with the Safetylayer-Tester. In documentation of Safetylayer-Tester, the watchdog test is required for certification. It should be checked whether the measured times are within tolerance. Maximum value = ((watchdog value + 10%) + device cycle time + inaccuracy of m...
- 18 Jul 2024, 14:49
- Forum: PROFIsafe
- Topic: How to differentiate between Profinet and Profisafe messages?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 14755
Re: How to differentiate between Profinet and Profisafe messages?
Hi Forum, My task: I am supposed to filter incoming/outgoing Profinet and Profisafe messages from a safety PLC (probably SIEMENS 15xx series) in a so-called "APL module" and incorporate them into a new frame. The black channel comes to the APL module via Ethernet APL and should now be for...
- 10 Oct 2023, 11:45
- Forum: Process - Certification "How to"
- Topic: Validity period of the Profinet certificate
- Replies: 3
- Views: 10030
- 10 Oct 2023, 11:38
- Forum: Process - Certification "How to"
- Topic: Changes allowed without triggering recertification
- Replies: 1
- Views: 7659
What modifications to an already certified Profinet device are permitted without necessitating the recertification process again ? If the modifications have no influence to the communication a recertification is not necessary. But you need extend your certificate to the new Software Version via a v...
- 09 Oct 2023, 13:57
- Forum: Process - Certification "How to"
- Topic: Vendor and Device ID
- Replies: 4
- Views: 14321
How can I acquire a vendor ID for my device ? You can acquire your vendor ID directly at the PI Office. Just write them an e-mail with your request and they will help you. PROFIBUS Nutzerorganisation e.V. (PNO) Ohiostr. 8 76149 Karlsruhe Tel.: +49 721 986 197 42 Fax: +49 721 986 197 11 certificati...