Search found 6 matches
- 08 Feb 2024, 12:04
- Forum: PROFINET Implementation
- Topic: Implementation of I&M4
- Replies: 1
- Views: 789
Re: Implementation of I&M4
Is the implementation of the I&M4 data record optional? The signatures/CRC in I&M4 are usable only for the safety parameterization or also for the complete device parameter set (also non safety parametersets)? Supporting of IuM4 is optional by a device. If a device supports PROFIsafe profil...
- 06 Nov 2023, 15:43
- Forum: PROFINET Test & Certification
- Topic: Netload test, X005 does not let see LLDP packets
- Replies: 4
- Views: 13748
Hello. This is my first post. I have some experience with PROFINET testing. I have a problem. We have two X005 SCALANCES, the part number recommended for the Netload test. One of the switches works as expected. But the other does not work as expected. I explain myself: The standard setup for netloa...
- 19 Oct 2023, 16:05
- Forum: PROFINET Implementation
- Topic: Port data change notification - line delay mismatch
- Replies: 2
- Views: 8229
- 13 Oct 2023, 10:15
- Forum: PROFIdrive
- Topic: Profidrive on both RT and IRT
- Replies: 2
- Views: 8851
- 13 Oct 2023, 10:01
- Forum: PROFINET Implementation
- Topic: Implementing Profinet in the device
- Replies: 5
- Views: 9380
Thank you. One additional question: What are the drawbacks or constraints of using a software-based Profinet solution ? You are welcome. Drawbacks are: - no IRT communication is possible - additional switch/PHY is required In general software based solutions do not support some of the features (li...
- 13 Oct 2023, 09:29
- Forum: PROFINET Implementation
- Topic: Available hardware based solutions
- Replies: 3
- Views: 7742
What hardware-based Profinet solutions are currently available in the market ? There is plenty of hardware supporting the PROFINET, which one fits for you depends on your requirements (desired features, integration needs..). The range spanns from standard ethernet controller up to full fledged FPG...