Search found 6 matches
- 19 Dec 2024, 16:14
- Forum: GSDX
- Topic: Can we retrospectively add files to a signed GSDX container?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 387
Re: Can we retrospectively add files to a signed GSDX container?
Can we retrospectively add files to a signed GSDX container? No, it’s not possible to add files to a signed GSDX container after the signature has been created. GSDX containers are designed to secure the entire content at the time of signing. Any modifications, such as adding new files, would leave...
- 19 Dec 2024, 16:14
- Forum: GSDX
- Topic: Will Security Class 1 be mandatory for all devices in the future?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 391
Re: Will Security Class 1 be mandatory for all devices in the future?
Security Class 1 and higher are optional and depend on the manufacturer’s choice.Webinar_Question wrote: ↑19 Dec 2024, 15:59 Will Security Class 1 be mandatory for all devices in the future?
- 19 Dec 2024, 16:14
- Forum: GSDX
- Topic: Is the PROFINET Security Class linked to the security levels defined in IEC 62443-4-2?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 365
Re: Is the PROFINET Security Class linked to the security levels defined in IEC 62443-4-2?
Is the PROFINET Security Class linked to the security levels defined in IEC 62443-4-2? PROFINET Security Class and the security levels defined in IEC 62443-4-2 are not directly linked. However, there is a whitepaper available that discusses the relationship between PROFINET Security and IEC 62443, ...
- 19 Dec 2024, 16:13
- Forum: GSDX
- Topic: Will all engineering systems need to be modified to be able to import GSDX files, in addition to traditional GSDML files
- Replies: 1
- Views: 381
Re: Will all engineering systems need to be modified to be able to import GSDX files, in addition to traditional GSDML f
Yes, since GSDX is a new technology that requires signature validation, engineering systems will need to be updated.Webinar_Question wrote: ↑19 Dec 2024, 16:00 Will all engineering systems need to be modified to be able to import GSDX files, in addition to traditional GSDML files?
- 19 Dec 2024, 16:13
- Forum: GSDX
- Topic: Do the device manufacturers have to provide the GSDX files with a new signature after 3 years?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 386
Re: Do the device manufacturers have to provide the GSDX files with a new signature after 3 years?
No, the GSDX files stay valid for a long period. Even when the certificate has expired, the GSDX file will remain valid.Webinar_Question wrote: ↑19 Dec 2024, 16:01 Do the device manufacturers have to provide the GSDX files with a new signature after 3 years, as is the case with the signature card?
- 19 Dec 2024, 16:12
- Forum: GSDX
- Topic: What does the Engineering tool need to check the signature?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 414
Re: What does the Engineering tool need to check the signature?
The exact behavior required for the Engineering tool to check the signature is described in the GSDX Specification. You can find more details in the document here: https://www.profibus.com/download/gsdml ... r-profinetWebinar_Question wrote: ↑19 Dec 2024, 16:01 What does the Engineering tool need to check the signature?