Hello, I have some questions regarding this test. 1. A PC with Ubuntu to run the SL1-Tester was prepared and it's working fine. Followed the instructions given by the document "How to install and to run the security level 1 tester V2.43.0.0_V1.0.pdf". This is sorted now. 2. Using "nor...

Hello, I've put together the pieces required to run this test, one of the last before shipping for official certification. Read what I found about it, so my test setup mimics Figure 5-21 from PROFINET Test Specification. Only difference is, my 'b' device is a XC208 rather than X204IRT; don't think ...

Hello, I've put together the pieces required to run this test, one of the last before shipping for official certification. Read what I found about it, so my test setup mimics Figure 5-21 from PROFINET Test Specification. Only difference is, my 'b' device is a XC208 rather than X204IRT; don't think t...

Hello, I need a helping hand concerning above mentioned test. My device is failing when I run AR-ASE S2 test, in the beginning of Scenario 1-4. Behavior 8, 9, 10 and 11, right in the sequence, are failing as well. AR-ASE and other behavior tests are ok. Log shows the following messages: 14:40:11 - ...

Hello, I need a helping hand concerning above mentioned test. My device is failing when I run AR-ASE S2 test, in the beginning of Scenario 1-4. Behavior 8, 9, 10 and 11, right in the sequence, are failing as well. AR-ASE and other behavior tests are ok. Log shows the following messages: 14:40:11 - A...

Hello, I am about to place an order for a ET200SP (the "d" device) to finish my in-house tests. Requested my local representative for a "6ES7155-6AU01-0CN0" but they quoted me a "6ES7155-6MU01-0CN0". Comparing their datasheets the only important different is the fact t...

Hello, I am about to place an order for a ET200SP (the "d" device) to finish my in-house tests. Requested my local representative for a "6ES7155-6AU01-0CN0" but they quoted me a "6ES7155-6MU01-0CN0". Comparing their datasheets the only important different is the fact th...

Hello, I'm having this exactly same problem when testing my device, but with the latest ART, version 2.45.0.2. Could it be a regression in test bundle? Does anybody experienced similar issue? Thanks. Yes, i see the same issue (message "According to the GSDML the 'IM5_Supported' is not set to '...

Hello,

I'm having this exactly same problem when testing my device, but with the latest ART, version 2.45.0.2.

Could it be a regression in test bundle? Does anybody experienced similar issue?

Thanks.

The S2 tests using ETS do not require a special topology. They use the connections you describe. Test cases are skipped based on device characteristics in the GSDML file. Does the device's GSDML file include the attribute DeviceTypes with a value of "S2"? There are additional interoperabi...

In your case the messages are only in the log, correct? In the report the tests are reported as skipped. I also see those ETS connection messages from time to time, and I usually ignore them... In the Certification Report those tests appear as "None", in red. PROFIenergy indeed appears as...

In your case the messages are only in the log, correct? In the report the tests are reported as skipped. I also see those ETS connection messages from time to time, and I usually ignore them... In the Certification Report those tests appear as "None", in red. PROFIenergy indeed appears as...

Hello, Whenever I try to run the PROFIsafe test (under Additional Testcase -> Profiles), I get an error message saying: 09:12:21 - Starting Testcase: PROFISAFE V2.4 STARTUP 09:12:23 - Configuration Test step 2: No PROFIsafe capable submodule with the selected version PROFIsafe V2.4 is available in t...

Hi, I have continued working on the tests and now one of the last sticking points is the TEDCheck (CLRPC)(Cisco) test. It's failing with the following error message (for both Standard and Legacy test): "No IPv4 address for remote entry 0.2.2 found in lldpRemManAddrTable" I am trying to fi...

Hi, I have continued working on the tests and now one of the last sticking points is the TEDCheck (CLRPC)(Cisco) test. It's failing with the following error message (for both Standard and Legacy test): "No IPv4 address for remote entry 0.2.2 found in lldpRemManAddrTable" I am trying to fig...

Hello, I am currently working to pre-test a 2-port PROFINET device which supports System Redundancy S2. The 10m cables go straight from the IF1 and IF2 from the ETS to ports 1 and 2 of the DUT. With this basic setup I am able to run most of the tests the ART presents. However, those that involve re...

Hello, I am currently working to pre-test a 2-port PROFINET device which supports System Redundancy S2. The 10m cables go straight from the IF1 and IF2 from the ETS to ports 1 and 2 of the DUT. With this basic setup I am able to run most of the tests the ART presents. However, those that involve red...