Search found 8 matches
- 07 Feb 2025, 13:13
- Forum: Getting Started - Automated RT Tester
- Topic: Setup required to pre-test a two-port PROFINET device with redundancy S2
- Replies: 5
- Views: 57145
Re: Setup required to pre-test a two-port PROFINET device with redundancy S2
The S2 tests using ETS do not require a special topology. They use the connections you describe. Test cases are skipped based on device characteristics in the GSDML file. Does the device's GSDML file include the attribute DeviceTypes with a value of "S2"? There are additional interoperabi...
- 06 Feb 2025, 17:55
- Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
- Topic: PROFIsafe test returning a connection error
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4920
Re: PROFIsafe test returning a connection error
In your case the messages are only in the log, correct? In the report the tests are reported as skipped. I also see those ETS connection messages from time to time, and I usually ignore them... In the Certification Report those tests appear as "None", in red. PROFIenergy indeed appears as...
- 06 Feb 2025, 17:28
- Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
- Topic: PROFIsafe test returning a connection error
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4920
Re: PROFIsafe test returning a connection error
In your case the messages are only in the log, correct? In the report the tests are reported as skipped. I also see those ETS connection messages from time to time, and I usually ignore them... In the Certification Report those tests appear as "None", in red. PROFIenergy indeed appears as...
- 06 Feb 2025, 13:27
- Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
- Topic: PROFIsafe test returning a connection error
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4920
PROFIsafe test returning a connection error
Hello, Whenever I try to run the PROFIsafe test (under Additional Testcase -> Profiles), I get an error message saying: 09:12:21 - Starting Testcase: PROFISAFE V2.4 STARTUP 09:12:23 - Configuration Test step 2: No PROFIsafe capable submodule with the selected version PROFIsafe V2.4 is available in t...
- 04 Feb 2025, 20:57
- Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
- Topic: TEDCheck (CLRPC)(Cisco) test failed
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3004
Re: TEDCheck (CLRPC)(Cisco) test failed
Hi, I have continued working on the tests and now one of the last sticking points is the TEDCheck (CLRPC)(Cisco) test. It's failing with the following error message (for both Standard and Legacy test): "No IPv4 address for remote entry 0.2.2 found in lldpRemManAddrTable" I am trying to fi...
- 03 Feb 2025, 17:16
- Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
- Topic: TEDCheck (CLRPC)(Cisco) test failed
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3004
TEDCheck (CLRPC)(Cisco) test failed
Hi, I have continued working on the tests and now one of the last sticking points is the TEDCheck (CLRPC)(Cisco) test. It's failing with the following error message (for both Standard and Legacy test): "No IPv4 address for remote entry 0.2.2 found in lldpRemManAddrTable" I am trying to fig...
- 31 Jan 2025, 13:37
- Forum: Getting Started - Automated RT Tester
- Topic: Setup required to pre-test a two-port PROFINET device with redundancy S2
- Replies: 5
- Views: 57145
Re: Setup required to pre-test a two-port PROFINET device with redundancy S2
Hello, I am currently working to pre-test a 2-port PROFINET device which supports System Redundancy S2. The 10m cables go straight from the IF1 and IF2 from the ETS to ports 1 and 2 of the DUT. With this basic setup I am able to run most of the tests the ART presents. However, those that involve re...
- 30 Jan 2025, 18:23
- Forum: Getting Started - Automated RT Tester
- Topic: Setup required to pre-test a two-port PROFINET device with redundancy S2
- Replies: 5
- Views: 57145
Setup required to pre-test a two-port PROFINET device with redundancy S2
Hello, I am currently working to pre-test a 2-port PROFINET device which supports System Redundancy S2. The 10m cables go straight from the IF1 and IF2 from the ETS to ports 1 and 2 of the DUT. With this basic setup I am able to run most of the tests the ART presents. However, those that involve red...