Search found 28 matches

by rottava
23 Jun 2026, 13:43
Forum: GSD-Checker
Topic: PROFINET GSD Editor returns error when attribute "AdjustSupported" is set to false
Replies: 2
Views: 14098

Re: PROFINET GSD Editor returns error when attribute "AdjustSupported" is set to false



Hello,

The GSDML file for the product we are developing is failing the check performed by the PROFINET GSD Editor V2.46. Checker complains about the attribute "AdjustSupported" when set to false (lines 85 and 90).

imagem.png

However, even with this issue in the GSDML, the relevant test run by ...
by rottava
25 May 2026, 18:50
Forum: GSD-Checker
Topic: PROFINET GSD Editor returns error when attribute "AdjustSupported" is set to false
Replies: 2
Views: 14098

PROFINET GSD Editor returns error when attribute "AdjustSupported" is set to false

Hello,

The GSDML file for the product we are developing is failing the check performed by the PROFINET GSD Editor V2.46. Checker complains about the attribute "AdjustSupported" when set to false (lines 85 and 90).

imagem.png

However, even with this issue in the GSDML, the relevant test run by ...
by rottava
15 Apr 2026, 14:41
Forum: Quality and Feedback
Topic: General information fields are not being filled up
Replies: 1
Views: 12870

General information fields are not being filled up

Hello,

I've noticed a simple issue in the ART 2.46.0. After running the tests, when I press the button to print the Certification Report, fields in the General Information, right in the cover page, are not being filled up.

Anybody else?

Best Regards,
Luciano.
by rottava
06 Mar 2026, 20:01
Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
Topic: Read out Information (CLRPC) Test failure
Replies: 2
Views: 9693

Re: Read out Information (CLRPC) Test failure



Hello,

Just upgraded my ETS system to the latest version, V2.46. Noticed there's a new test case, called "Read out Information (CLRPC)".

To validate the installation, run it with my dut previously approved by 2.45. All test cases were cleared, except this new one.

Based on the description ...
by rottava
25 Feb 2026, 19:33
Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
Topic: Read out Information (CLRPC) Test failure
Replies: 2
Views: 9693

Read out Information (CLRPC) Test failure

Hello,

Just upgraded my ETS system to the latest version, V2.46. Noticed there's a new test case, called "Read out Information (CLRPC)".

To validate the installation, run it with my dut previously approved by 2.45. All test cases were cleared, except this new one.

Based on the description ...
by rottava
15 Jan 2026, 20:51
Forum: Community Stack
Topic: CS with FreeRTOS+lwIP and memory requirements
Replies: 3
Views: 13022

Re: CS with FreeRTOS+lwIP and memory requirements



Hi everyone,

We've recently downloaded the Community Stack source code, and now we are performing tests and evaluating the results to create a proof of concept prototype.

Community Stack targets a Linux system, but we are planning in using FreeRTOS + lwIP. Given the complexity of our (future ...
by rottava
14 Jan 2026, 20:56
Forum: Community Stack
Topic: CS with FreeRTOS+lwIP and memory requirements
Replies: 3
Views: 13022

CS with FreeRTOS+lwIP and memory requirements

Hi everyone,

We've recently downloaded the Community Stack source code, and now we are performing tests and evaluating the results to create a proof of concept prototype.

Community Stack targets a Linux system, but we are planning in using FreeRTOS + lwIP. Given the complexity of our (future ...
by rottava
15 May 2025, 21:12
Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
Topic: Manual-DHT Testcase
Replies: 1
Views: 44060

Manual-DHT Testcase

Hello,

Of all tests performed, only one is reporting 'Inconclusive', Manual-DHT.

Screenshot 2025-05-15 160547.png
Screenshot 2025-05-15 155522.png

As a result, Certification Report shows one error. According to TCS_00000014_DHT document, page 11, "... a manual investigation shall ensure the ...
by rottava
07 May 2025, 20:44
Forum: Miscellaneous
Topic: Different part number for ET200SP device
Replies: 3
Views: 142074

Re: Different part number for ET200SP device




Hello,

I am about to place an order for a ET200SP (the "d" device) to finish my in-house tests. Requested my local representative for a "6ES7155-6AU01-0CN0" but they quoted me a "6ES7155-6MU01-0CN0". Comparing their datasheets the only important different is the fact that the latter supports ...
by rottava
23 Apr 2025, 22:46
Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
Topic: Netload Robustness for Security test
Replies: 4
Views: 68974

Re: Netload Robustness for Security test






Hi Luciano,

1. What exactly does the error message from the PLC say?

2. The Scalance X208 will not work for netload testing because it is a managed switch. An unmanaged "dumb" switch is needed for netload testing so the maximum network traffic is transmitted to the dut. The unmanaged ...
by rottava
22 Apr 2025, 20:09
Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
Topic: Netload Robustness for Security test
Replies: 4
Views: 68974

Re: Netload Robustness for Security test



Hello,

I have some questions regarding this test.

1. A PC with Ubuntu to run the SL1-Tester was prepared and it's working fine. Followed the instructions given by the document "How to install and to run the security level 1 tester V2.43.0.0_V1.0.pdf". This is sorted now.

2. Using "normal_d_V2 ...
by rottava
17 Apr 2025, 21:26
Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
Topic: Netload Robustness for Security test
Replies: 4
Views: 68974

Netload Robustness for Security test

Hello,

I have some questions regarding this test.

1. A PC with Ubuntu to run the SL1-Tester was prepared and it's working fine. Followed the instructions given by the document "How to install and to run the security level 1 tester V2.43.0.0_V1.0.pdf". This is sorted now.

2. Using "normal_d_V2.43 ...
by rottava
15 Apr 2025, 15:41
Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
Topic: MRP Interop - Client (CLRPC) test question
Replies: 4
Views: 119840

Re: MRP Interop - Client (CLRPC) test question



Hello,

I've put together the pieces required to run this test, one of the last before shipping for official certification.

Read what I found about it, so my test setup mimics Figure 5-21 from PROFINET Test Specification. Only difference is, my 'b' device is a XC208 rather than X204IRT; don't ...
by rottava
10 Apr 2025, 19:28
Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
Topic: MRP Interop - Client (CLRPC) test question
Replies: 4
Views: 119840

MRP Interop - Client (CLRPC) test question

Hello,

I've put together the pieces required to run this test, one of the last before shipping for official certification.

Read what I found about it, so my test setup mimics Figure 5-21 from PROFINET Test Specification. Only difference is, my 'b' device is a XC208 rather than X204IRT; don't think ...
by rottava
27 Mar 2025, 19:19
Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
Topic: AR-ASE S2 test failed
Replies: 3
Views: 98440

Re: AR-ASE S2 test failed



Hello,

I need a helping hand concerning above mentioned test. My device is failing when I run AR-ASE S2 test, in the beginning of Scenario 1-4. Behavior 8, 9, 10 and 11, right in the sequence, are failing as well. AR-ASE and other behavior tests are ok.

Log shows the following messages:
14:40 ...
by rottava
19 Mar 2025, 19:09
Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
Topic: AR-ASE S2 test failed
Replies: 3
Views: 98440

AR-ASE S2 test failed

Hello,

I need a helping hand concerning above mentioned test. My device is failing when I run AR-ASE S2 test, in the beginning of Scenario 1-4. Behavior 8, 9, 10 and 11, right in the sequence, are failing as well. AR-ASE and other behavior tests are ok.

Log shows the following messages:
14:40:11 ...
by rottava
14 Mar 2025, 14:30
Forum: Miscellaneous
Topic: Different part number for ET200SP device
Replies: 3
Views: 142074

Re: Different part number for ET200SP device



Hello,

I am about to place an order for a ET200SP (the "d" device) to finish my in-house tests. Requested my local representative for a "6ES7155-6AU01-0CN0" but they quoted me a "6ES7155-6MU01-0CN0". Comparing their datasheets the only important different is the fact that the latter supports ...
by rottava
12 Mar 2025, 14:27
Forum: Miscellaneous
Topic: Different part number for ET200SP device
Replies: 3
Views: 142074

Different part number for ET200SP device

Hello,

I am about to place an order for a ET200SP (the "d" device) to finish my in-house tests. Requested my local representative for a "6ES7155-6AU01-0CN0" but they quoted me a "6ES7155-6MU01-0CN0". Comparing their datasheets the only important different is the fact that the latter supports other ...
by rottava
26 Feb 2025, 16:49
Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
Topic: IM5_Supported_ETS_ART_2.44.1_Problem
Replies: 5
Views: 81281

Re: IM5_Supported_ETS_ART_2.44.1_Problem



Hello,

I'm having this exactly same problem when testing my device, but with the latest ART, version 2.45.0.2.

Could it be a regression in test bundle? Does anybody experienced similar issue?

Thanks.


Yes, i see the same issue (message "According to the GSDML the 'IM5_Supported' is not set ...
by rottava
26 Feb 2025, 14:23
Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
Topic: IM5_Supported_ETS_ART_2.44.1_Problem
Replies: 5
Views: 81281

Re: IM5_Supported_ETS_ART_2.44.1_Problem

Hello,

I'm having this exactly same problem when testing my device, but with the latest ART, version 2.45.0.2.

Could it be a regression in test bundle? Does anybody experienced similar issue?

Thanks.
by rottava
07 Feb 2025, 13:13
Forum: Getting Started - Automated RT Tester
Topic: Setup required to pre-test a two-port PROFINET device with redundancy S2
Replies: 5
Views: 137175

Re: Setup required to pre-test a two-port PROFINET device with redundancy S2






The S2 tests using ETS do not require a special topology. They use the connections you describe. Test cases are skipped based on device characteristics in the GSDML file. Does the device's GSDML file include the attribute DeviceTypes with a value of "S2"?

There are additional ...
by rottava
06 Feb 2025, 17:55
Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
Topic: PROFIsafe test returning a connection error
Replies: 3
Views: 50719

Re: PROFIsafe test returning a connection error



In your case the messages are only in the log, correct? In the report the tests are reported as skipped.

I also see those ETS connection messages from time to time, and I usually ignore them...


In the Certification Report those tests appear as "None", in red. PROFIenergy indeed appears as ...
by rottava
06 Feb 2025, 17:28
Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
Topic: PROFIsafe test returning a connection error
Replies: 3
Views: 50719

Re: PROFIsafe test returning a connection error


In your case the messages are only in the log, correct? In the report the tests are reported as skipped.

I also see those ETS connection messages from time to time, and I usually ignore them...


In the Certification Report those tests appear as "None", in red. PROFIenergy indeed appears as ...
by rottava
06 Feb 2025, 13:27
Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
Topic: PROFIsafe test returning a connection error
Replies: 3
Views: 50719

PROFIsafe test returning a connection error

Hello,

Whenever I try to run the PROFIsafe test (under Additional Testcase -> Profiles), I get an error message saying:

09:12:21 - Starting Testcase: PROFISAFE V2.4 STARTUP
09:12:23 - Configuration Test step 2: No PROFIsafe capable submodule with the selected version PROFIsafe V2.4 is available in ...
by rottava
04 Feb 2025, 20:57
Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
Topic: TEDCheck (CLRPC)(Cisco) test failed
Replies: 1
Views: 36845

Re: TEDCheck (CLRPC)(Cisco) test failed


Hi,
I have continued working on the tests and now one of the last sticking points is the TEDCheck (CLRPC)(Cisco) test.

It's failing with the following error message (for both Standard and Legacy test):
"No IPv4 address for remote entry 0.2.2 found in lldpRemManAddrTable"

I am trying to figure ...
by rottava
03 Feb 2025, 17:16
Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
Topic: TEDCheck (CLRPC)(Cisco) test failed
Replies: 1
Views: 36845

TEDCheck (CLRPC)(Cisco) test failed

Hi,
I have continued working on the tests and now one of the last sticking points is the TEDCheck (CLRPC)(Cisco) test.

It's failing with the following error message (for both Standard and Legacy test):
"No IPv4 address for remote entry 0.2.2 found in lldpRemManAddrTable"

I am trying to figure out ...
by rottava
31 Jan 2025, 13:37
Forum: Getting Started - Automated RT Tester
Topic: Setup required to pre-test a two-port PROFINET device with redundancy S2
Replies: 5
Views: 137175

Re: Setup required to pre-test a two-port PROFINET device with redundancy S2



Hello,

I am currently working to pre-test a 2-port PROFINET device which supports System Redundancy S2. The 10m cables go straight from the IF1 and IF2 from the ETS to ports 1 and 2 of the DUT. With this basic setup I am able to run most of the tests the ART presents. However, those that ...
by rottava
30 Jan 2025, 18:23
Forum: Getting Started - Automated RT Tester
Topic: Setup required to pre-test a two-port PROFINET device with redundancy S2
Replies: 5
Views: 137175

Setup required to pre-test a two-port PROFINET device with redundancy S2

Hello,

I am currently working to pre-test a 2-port PROFINET device which supports System Redundancy S2. The 10m cables go straight from the IF1 and IF2 from the ETS to ports 1 and 2 of the DUT. With this basic setup I am able to run most of the tests the ART presents. However, those that involve ...