Search found 28 matches
- 23 Jun 2026, 13:43
- Forum: GSD-Checker
- Topic: PROFINET GSD Editor returns error when attribute "AdjustSupported" is set to false
- Replies: 2
- Views: 14098
Re: PROFINET GSD Editor returns error when attribute "AdjustSupported" is set to false
Hello,
The GSDML file for the product we are developing is failing the check performed by the PROFINET GSD Editor V2.46. Checker complains about the attribute "AdjustSupported" when set to false (lines 85 and 90).
imagem.png
However, even with this issue in the GSDML, the relevant test run by ...
- 25 May 2026, 18:50
- Forum: GSD-Checker
- Topic: PROFINET GSD Editor returns error when attribute "AdjustSupported" is set to false
- Replies: 2
- Views: 14098
PROFINET GSD Editor returns error when attribute "AdjustSupported" is set to false
Hello,
The GSDML file for the product we are developing is failing the check performed by the PROFINET GSD Editor V2.46. Checker complains about the attribute "AdjustSupported" when set to false (lines 85 and 90).
imagem.png
However, even with this issue in the GSDML, the relevant test run by ...
The GSDML file for the product we are developing is failing the check performed by the PROFINET GSD Editor V2.46. Checker complains about the attribute "AdjustSupported" when set to false (lines 85 and 90).
imagem.png
However, even with this issue in the GSDML, the relevant test run by ...
- 15 Apr 2026, 14:41
- Forum: Quality and Feedback
- Topic: General information fields are not being filled up
- Replies: 1
- Views: 12870
General information fields are not being filled up
Hello,
I've noticed a simple issue in the ART 2.46.0. After running the tests, when I press the button to print the Certification Report, fields in the General Information, right in the cover page, are not being filled up.
Anybody else?
Best Regards,
Luciano.
I've noticed a simple issue in the ART 2.46.0. After running the tests, when I press the button to print the Certification Report, fields in the General Information, right in the cover page, are not being filled up.
Anybody else?
Best Regards,
Luciano.
- 06 Mar 2026, 20:01
- Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
- Topic: Read out Information (CLRPC) Test failure
- Replies: 2
- Views: 9693
Re: Read out Information (CLRPC) Test failure
Hello,
Just upgraded my ETS system to the latest version, V2.46. Noticed there's a new test case, called "Read out Information (CLRPC)".
To validate the installation, run it with my dut previously approved by 2.45. All test cases were cleared, except this new one.
Based on the description ...
- 25 Feb 2026, 19:33
- Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
- Topic: Read out Information (CLRPC) Test failure
- Replies: 2
- Views: 9693
Read out Information (CLRPC) Test failure
Hello,
Just upgraded my ETS system to the latest version, V2.46. Noticed there's a new test case, called "Read out Information (CLRPC)".
To validate the installation, run it with my dut previously approved by 2.45. All test cases were cleared, except this new one.
Based on the description ...
Just upgraded my ETS system to the latest version, V2.46. Noticed there's a new test case, called "Read out Information (CLRPC)".
To validate the installation, run it with my dut previously approved by 2.45. All test cases were cleared, except this new one.
Based on the description ...
- 15 Jan 2026, 20:51
- Forum: Community Stack
- Topic: CS with FreeRTOS+lwIP and memory requirements
- Replies: 3
- Views: 13022
Re: CS with FreeRTOS+lwIP and memory requirements
Hi everyone,
We've recently downloaded the Community Stack source code, and now we are performing tests and evaluating the results to create a proof of concept prototype.
Community Stack targets a Linux system, but we are planning in using FreeRTOS + lwIP. Given the complexity of our (future ...
- 14 Jan 2026, 20:56
- Forum: Community Stack
- Topic: CS with FreeRTOS+lwIP and memory requirements
- Replies: 3
- Views: 13022
CS with FreeRTOS+lwIP and memory requirements
Hi everyone,
We've recently downloaded the Community Stack source code, and now we are performing tests and evaluating the results to create a proof of concept prototype.
Community Stack targets a Linux system, but we are planning in using FreeRTOS + lwIP. Given the complexity of our (future ...
We've recently downloaded the Community Stack source code, and now we are performing tests and evaluating the results to create a proof of concept prototype.
Community Stack targets a Linux system, but we are planning in using FreeRTOS + lwIP. Given the complexity of our (future ...
- 15 May 2025, 21:12
- Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
- Topic: Manual-DHT Testcase
- Replies: 1
- Views: 44060
Manual-DHT Testcase
Hello,
Of all tests performed, only one is reporting 'Inconclusive', Manual-DHT.
Screenshot 2025-05-15 160547.png
Screenshot 2025-05-15 155522.png
As a result, Certification Report shows one error. According to TCS_00000014_DHT document, page 11, "... a manual investigation shall ensure the ...
Of all tests performed, only one is reporting 'Inconclusive', Manual-DHT.
Screenshot 2025-05-15 160547.png
Screenshot 2025-05-15 155522.png
As a result, Certification Report shows one error. According to TCS_00000014_DHT document, page 11, "... a manual investigation shall ensure the ...
- 07 May 2025, 20:44
- Forum: Miscellaneous
- Topic: Different part number for ET200SP device
- Replies: 3
- Views: 142074
Re: Different part number for ET200SP device
Hello,
I am about to place an order for a ET200SP (the "d" device) to finish my in-house tests. Requested my local representative for a "6ES7155-6AU01-0CN0" but they quoted me a "6ES7155-6MU01-0CN0". Comparing their datasheets the only important different is the fact that the latter supports ...
- 23 Apr 2025, 22:46
- Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
- Topic: Netload Robustness for Security test
- Replies: 4
- Views: 68974
Re: Netload Robustness for Security test
Hi Luciano,
1. What exactly does the error message from the PLC say?
2. The Scalance X208 will not work for netload testing because it is a managed switch. An unmanaged "dumb" switch is needed for netload testing so the maximum network traffic is transmitted to the dut. The unmanaged ...
- 22 Apr 2025, 20:09
- Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
- Topic: Netload Robustness for Security test
- Replies: 4
- Views: 68974
Re: Netload Robustness for Security test
Hello,
I have some questions regarding this test.
1. A PC with Ubuntu to run the SL1-Tester was prepared and it's working fine. Followed the instructions given by the document "How to install and to run the security level 1 tester V2.43.0.0_V1.0.pdf". This is sorted now.
2. Using "normal_d_V2 ...
- 17 Apr 2025, 21:26
- Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
- Topic: Netload Robustness for Security test
- Replies: 4
- Views: 68974
Netload Robustness for Security test
Hello,
I have some questions regarding this test.
1. A PC with Ubuntu to run the SL1-Tester was prepared and it's working fine. Followed the instructions given by the document "How to install and to run the security level 1 tester V2.43.0.0_V1.0.pdf". This is sorted now.
2. Using "normal_d_V2.43 ...
I have some questions regarding this test.
1. A PC with Ubuntu to run the SL1-Tester was prepared and it's working fine. Followed the instructions given by the document "How to install and to run the security level 1 tester V2.43.0.0_V1.0.pdf". This is sorted now.
2. Using "normal_d_V2.43 ...
- 15 Apr 2025, 15:41
- Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
- Topic: MRP Interop - Client (CLRPC) test question
- Replies: 4
- Views: 119840
Re: MRP Interop - Client (CLRPC) test question
Hello,
I've put together the pieces required to run this test, one of the last before shipping for official certification.
Read what I found about it, so my test setup mimics Figure 5-21 from PROFINET Test Specification. Only difference is, my 'b' device is a XC208 rather than X204IRT; don't ...
- 10 Apr 2025, 19:28
- Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
- Topic: MRP Interop - Client (CLRPC) test question
- Replies: 4
- Views: 119840
MRP Interop - Client (CLRPC) test question
Hello,
I've put together the pieces required to run this test, one of the last before shipping for official certification.
Read what I found about it, so my test setup mimics Figure 5-21 from PROFINET Test Specification. Only difference is, my 'b' device is a XC208 rather than X204IRT; don't think ...
I've put together the pieces required to run this test, one of the last before shipping for official certification.
Read what I found about it, so my test setup mimics Figure 5-21 from PROFINET Test Specification. Only difference is, my 'b' device is a XC208 rather than X204IRT; don't think ...
- 27 Mar 2025, 19:19
- Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
- Topic: AR-ASE S2 test failed
- Replies: 3
- Views: 98440
Re: AR-ASE S2 test failed
Hello,
I need a helping hand concerning above mentioned test. My device is failing when I run AR-ASE S2 test, in the beginning of Scenario 1-4. Behavior 8, 9, 10 and 11, right in the sequence, are failing as well. AR-ASE and other behavior tests are ok.
Log shows the following messages:
14:40 ...
- 19 Mar 2025, 19:09
- Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
- Topic: AR-ASE S2 test failed
- Replies: 3
- Views: 98440
AR-ASE S2 test failed
Hello,
I need a helping hand concerning above mentioned test. My device is failing when I run AR-ASE S2 test, in the beginning of Scenario 1-4. Behavior 8, 9, 10 and 11, right in the sequence, are failing as well. AR-ASE and other behavior tests are ok.
Log shows the following messages:
14:40:11 ...
I need a helping hand concerning above mentioned test. My device is failing when I run AR-ASE S2 test, in the beginning of Scenario 1-4. Behavior 8, 9, 10 and 11, right in the sequence, are failing as well. AR-ASE and other behavior tests are ok.
Log shows the following messages:
14:40:11 ...
- 14 Mar 2025, 14:30
- Forum: Miscellaneous
- Topic: Different part number for ET200SP device
- Replies: 3
- Views: 142074
Re: Different part number for ET200SP device
Hello,
I am about to place an order for a ET200SP (the "d" device) to finish my in-house tests. Requested my local representative for a "6ES7155-6AU01-0CN0" but they quoted me a "6ES7155-6MU01-0CN0". Comparing their datasheets the only important different is the fact that the latter supports ...
- 12 Mar 2025, 14:27
- Forum: Miscellaneous
- Topic: Different part number for ET200SP device
- Replies: 3
- Views: 142074
Different part number for ET200SP device
Hello,
I am about to place an order for a ET200SP (the "d" device) to finish my in-house tests. Requested my local representative for a "6ES7155-6AU01-0CN0" but they quoted me a "6ES7155-6MU01-0CN0". Comparing their datasheets the only important different is the fact that the latter supports other ...
I am about to place an order for a ET200SP (the "d" device) to finish my in-house tests. Requested my local representative for a "6ES7155-6AU01-0CN0" but they quoted me a "6ES7155-6MU01-0CN0". Comparing their datasheets the only important different is the fact that the latter supports other ...
- 26 Feb 2025, 16:49
- Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
- Topic: IM5_Supported_ETS_ART_2.44.1_Problem
- Replies: 5
- Views: 81281
Re: IM5_Supported_ETS_ART_2.44.1_Problem
Hello,
I'm having this exactly same problem when testing my device, but with the latest ART, version 2.45.0.2.
Could it be a regression in test bundle? Does anybody experienced similar issue?
Thanks.
Yes, i see the same issue (message "According to the GSDML the 'IM5_Supported' is not set ...
- 26 Feb 2025, 14:23
- Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
- Topic: IM5_Supported_ETS_ART_2.44.1_Problem
- Replies: 5
- Views: 81281
Re: IM5_Supported_ETS_ART_2.44.1_Problem
Hello,
I'm having this exactly same problem when testing my device, but with the latest ART, version 2.45.0.2.
Could it be a regression in test bundle? Does anybody experienced similar issue?
Thanks.
I'm having this exactly same problem when testing my device, but with the latest ART, version 2.45.0.2.
Could it be a regression in test bundle? Does anybody experienced similar issue?
Thanks.
- 07 Feb 2025, 13:13
- Forum: Getting Started - Automated RT Tester
- Topic: Setup required to pre-test a two-port PROFINET device with redundancy S2
- Replies: 5
- Views: 137175
Re: Setup required to pre-test a two-port PROFINET device with redundancy S2
The S2 tests using ETS do not require a special topology. They use the connections you describe. Test cases are skipped based on device characteristics in the GSDML file. Does the device's GSDML file include the attribute DeviceTypes with a value of "S2"?
There are additional ...
- 06 Feb 2025, 17:55
- Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
- Topic: PROFIsafe test returning a connection error
- Replies: 3
- Views: 50719
Re: PROFIsafe test returning a connection error
In your case the messages are only in the log, correct? In the report the tests are reported as skipped.
I also see those ETS connection messages from time to time, and I usually ignore them...
In the Certification Report those tests appear as "None", in red. PROFIenergy indeed appears as ...
- 06 Feb 2025, 17:28
- Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
- Topic: PROFIsafe test returning a connection error
- Replies: 3
- Views: 50719
Re: PROFIsafe test returning a connection error
In your case the messages are only in the log, correct? In the report the tests are reported as skipped.
I also see those ETS connection messages from time to time, and I usually ignore them...
In the Certification Report those tests appear as "None", in red. PROFIenergy indeed appears as ...
- 06 Feb 2025, 13:27
- Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
- Topic: PROFIsafe test returning a connection error
- Replies: 3
- Views: 50719
PROFIsafe test returning a connection error
Hello,
Whenever I try to run the PROFIsafe test (under Additional Testcase -> Profiles), I get an error message saying:
09:12:21 - Starting Testcase: PROFISAFE V2.4 STARTUP
09:12:23 - Configuration Test step 2: No PROFIsafe capable submodule with the selected version PROFIsafe V2.4 is available in ...
Whenever I try to run the PROFIsafe test (under Additional Testcase -> Profiles), I get an error message saying:
09:12:21 - Starting Testcase: PROFISAFE V2.4 STARTUP
09:12:23 - Configuration Test step 2: No PROFIsafe capable submodule with the selected version PROFIsafe V2.4 is available in ...
- 04 Feb 2025, 20:57
- Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
- Topic: TEDCheck (CLRPC)(Cisco) test failed
- Replies: 1
- Views: 36845
Re: TEDCheck (CLRPC)(Cisco) test failed
Hi,
I have continued working on the tests and now one of the last sticking points is the TEDCheck (CLRPC)(Cisco) test.
It's failing with the following error message (for both Standard and Legacy test):
"No IPv4 address for remote entry 0.2.2 found in lldpRemManAddrTable"
I am trying to figure ...
- 03 Feb 2025, 17:16
- Forum: Specific Test Case Questions
- Topic: TEDCheck (CLRPC)(Cisco) test failed
- Replies: 1
- Views: 36845
TEDCheck (CLRPC)(Cisco) test failed
Hi,
I have continued working on the tests and now one of the last sticking points is the TEDCheck (CLRPC)(Cisco) test.
It's failing with the following error message (for both Standard and Legacy test):
"No IPv4 address for remote entry 0.2.2 found in lldpRemManAddrTable"
I am trying to figure out ...
I have continued working on the tests and now one of the last sticking points is the TEDCheck (CLRPC)(Cisco) test.
It's failing with the following error message (for both Standard and Legacy test):
"No IPv4 address for remote entry 0.2.2 found in lldpRemManAddrTable"
I am trying to figure out ...
- 31 Jan 2025, 13:37
- Forum: Getting Started - Automated RT Tester
- Topic: Setup required to pre-test a two-port PROFINET device with redundancy S2
- Replies: 5
- Views: 137175
Re: Setup required to pre-test a two-port PROFINET device with redundancy S2
Hello,
I am currently working to pre-test a 2-port PROFINET device which supports System Redundancy S2. The 10m cables go straight from the IF1 and IF2 from the ETS to ports 1 and 2 of the DUT. With this basic setup I am able to run most of the tests the ART presents. However, those that ...
- 30 Jan 2025, 18:23
- Forum: Getting Started - Automated RT Tester
- Topic: Setup required to pre-test a two-port PROFINET device with redundancy S2
- Replies: 5
- Views: 137175
Setup required to pre-test a two-port PROFINET device with redundancy S2
Hello,
I am currently working to pre-test a 2-port PROFINET device which supports System Redundancy S2. The 10m cables go straight from the IF1 and IF2 from the ETS to ports 1 and 2 of the DUT. With this basic setup I am able to run most of the tests the ART presents. However, those that involve ...
I am currently working to pre-test a 2-port PROFINET device which supports System Redundancy S2. The 10m cables go straight from the IF1 and IF2 from the ETS to ports 1 and 2 of the DUT. With this basic setup I am able to run most of the tests the ART presents. However, those that involve ...